Space exploration is much too expensive and the money should be spent on more important things What is your opinion

Other planets have been discovered after decades of researches made by scientists. Space exploration is costly, and the cash should be used for more relevant stuff. In this essay I will discuss how the finance set aside for space exploration can assist in providing food and shelter for the needy, and the reason why space exploration is irrelevant to the human race.

Monetary assistance will help in providing meals and a place to stay for people who are in need rather than making it a budget for exploring space. There is no need exploring space when internally displaced people all over the world need financial aids from Governments across the globe. Similarly, given that Correctional Centers are where prisoners are kept, it is expedient that they should be fed well, and their environments should be made very conducive for them. Clearly, it is better to help the needy with funds rather than spend it on space exploration.

Exploration of space is irrelevant to the human race because it does not solve any earthly problems. Earth is a planet and it should focus on issues that concerns it. To illustrate, issues of insecurity caused by terrorists in most countries worldwide cannot be solved whenever we talk about space. Take a look at the war between Russia and Ukraine, it can be only be solved by humans, so aliens cannot come up with a credible solution. If the instances given above are understood, then we would have clarity that seeking to know more about space does not solve the challenges that arise on earth.

In this essay I have discussed how the finance set aside for space exploration can assist in providing food and shelter for the needy, and the reason why space exploration is irrelevant to the human race. My opinion on this matter is that we should focus on the relevant things until positive results are achieved. Let us walk on the right pass when we know it is the way to go.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, similarly, so, then, well

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1588.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 333.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76876876877 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56050694892 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525525525526 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 504.0 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.0931874628 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.866666667 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.33333333333 7.06120827912 33% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220558926645 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0788227657411 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0565446363877 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143034346344 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0193322668867 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.