In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.
Why is this the case?
What can be done about this problem?
The impoverished members of society are facing starvation in many parts of the world despite the fact that significant advances have been invented for agriculture in the pursuit of adequate food supply. This essay would chance upon the reason responsible for scarcity of food and would suggest steps to mitigate the issue.
The first reason for a substantial amount of the population simply facing starvation can be attributed to the rapid growth in population. How is it possible to feed so many stomachs? Especially, if the rate at which babies are produced, according a recent survey conducted world health organisation claimed that two hundred sixty babies were being produced across the world in a span of a minute. So regardless of the remarkable technological advancement in the field of agriculture, even with a lot of state-of-art machinery, tools etc. Still it is no match for the ever-growing population. For example, all Asian countries especially India and China are considered the most populous countries, due to not being able the control the baby boom. This is the reason for more than half of the people having to go to bed on an empty stomach. So until and unless we keep a watch on the growth of population no amount of technological advancement could be totally beneficial
Another factor playing a part in individuals going hungry in the presence of advances in agriculture is the unpredictable adverse weather due to global warming. Ecologically, for increasing sea level, floods have destroyed countless acres of productive lands along many coastal regions in recent years. What is more, rainfall is arriving late in a few areas and has even disappeared in some regions, which leads to fewer crop rotation and dying plantations. No wonder people are starving in the middle of tens of thousands of arable lands. As far as the solution is concerned, governments should pass laws and produce awareness-raising campaign regarding the environment within their nations and try to agree with international leaders to find remedies for global warming. If these problems are not addressed now, the future of the whole planet earth will be bleak and most nations will face famine.
In conclusion, those living under the poverty line being hungry in the midst of up-to-date agricultural inventions stem from the ever growing rate of population and unpredictable adverse weather. Only when governments and the people take prolific measures to control the population growth as well as an attempt to combat global warming, will starvation be a thing of the past
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-17 | CharanpreetSingh | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-21 | sana_em | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-17 | jobanjeet | 84 | view |
| 2019-10-23 | gayathri subarshan | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-11 | sukhg1997@gmail.com | 84 | view |
- Some people believe that allowing children to make their own choices on everyday matters (such as food, clothes and entertainment) is likely to result in a society of individuals who only think about their own wishes. Other people believe that it is impor 89
- In some countries, many more people are choosing to live alone now days than in the past.Do you think this is a positive or negative development? 84
- The quality of health care a person receives should not depend on the size of their bank balance. The government is responsible for providing a high level of heath care for all its citizens. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- Marriages are bigger and more expensive nowadays than in the past. Why is this the case? Is it a negative or positive development? 84
- People naturally resist making changes in their lives.What kind of problems can this cause? What solutions can you suggest? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, regarding, so, still, well, for example, in conclusion, as well as, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 41.998997996 155% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2163.0 1615.20841683 134% => OK
No of words: 419.0 315.596192385 133% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16229116945 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52432199235 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96721970457 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 246.0 176.041082164 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587112171838 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 673.2 506.74238477 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.0942613329 49.4020404114 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.235294118 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6470588235 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.64705882353 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173752909976 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0495427204004 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0286188611682 0.0667982634062 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0932518198785 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0400104300448 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.