In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.
Why is this the case?
What can be done about this problem?
In this era of industrialization, technology gained a lot of achievements that make variety of advancements in the field of agriculture. However, in spite of all this success, major section of the society remains deprived from food all over the globe. This essay reflects light on the causes and possible panacea that helps to conquer that prevailing issue.
There are multifarious points that can endorse the reasons of food shortage among folks. First and foremost, greediness towards capital by the owners. To be specific, owners raise their per capita by selling their good quality productivity to international traders in order to earn huge amount of profit. As a result, major section of food production sold out and only least share remains that can provoke hunger in that nation. Secondly, unemployment rate also contributed to this issue. To demonstrate, machinery replace the manual work that can inversely enhance the jobless people count. That section of society unable to feed their family resulted in high hunger ratio in the community. Last but not least is the food adulteration done by many food companies. To illustrate, lentils are mixed with stones to increase the weightage and many food colouring agents are added that seriously effect the health of a common man. Consequently, these all beneficial for the producer but badly influencing the public by surging the hunger and plunging the quality of product.
To embark with the remedial measures, local authority inspected the food companies on regular basis. Along with this, heavy penalty imposed on the culprits. Moreover, food quality camps organised to aware local people about checking good quality of the food.
To recapitulate, no doubt, agricultural advancement is the need of this century, but by ignoring the personal profits, the problem of hunger resolved with combined efforts of authorities and masses.
- You saw a brochure for a one-week walking tour in the mountains. You're very interested in taking part, but you're not very fit and are worried you wouldn't be able to keep up. Write to the tour operator. In your letter:• Explain why you're interested i 84
- Smoking not only harms the smoker, but also those who are nearby. Therefore, smoking should be banned in public places.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- You have a full-time job and you are also doing a part-time evening course.You now find that you cannot continue the course.Write a letter to your teachers. In your letter•describe the situation•explain why you cannot continue at this time•say what 73
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.Why is this the case?What can be done about this problem? 84
- People live longer today and so people should stay in the workforce longer To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In this era of industrialization, techno...
^^^
Line 4, column 841, Rule ID: MANY_FEW_UNCOUNTABLE[2]
Message: Use 'much' or 'little' with uncountable nouns.
Suggestion: much; little
...th stones to increase the weightage and many food colouring agents are added that se...
^^^^
Line 4, column 841, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun food seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much food', 'a good deal of food'.
Suggestion: much food; a good deal of food
...th stones to increase the weightage and many food colouring agents are added that serious...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 200, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ined efforts of authorities and masses.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, no doubt, as a result, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1603.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34333333333 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84591520136 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.9550818112 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.2941176471 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6470588235 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.52941176471 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178157133694 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0518254425946 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0407410886647 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108312698492 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0342133894582 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.95 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.