In spite of the advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry Why is this the case What can be done about this problem

Evidence suggests that there is an impressive development in agriculture, However, plenty of people all over the world suffer hunger. There are specific causes behind this problem and effective policies can be taken to solve it.
To begin with, the most rational reason for this problem could be famine and poverty which have a positive correlation. That is to say, although the agriculture industry has experienced considerable improvements, many countries endure crises such as drought and starvation which are due in part to climate changes but almost human interference. Take Soomaaliya in east Africa that has the highest number of death by starvation because of its barren and infertile lands as an example. To put it differently, high advanced agriculture technologies do not help this problem specifically. Simply put, the food is produced by these tools are almost very expensive and poverty who live in poor areas can not afford to buy it.
There are however some workable solutions to resolve this phenomenon. One step would be reducing the cost of food in deprived regions to simplify its supplement for poor people. This in turn will be happened by lay the foundation to increase the proportion of production. It needs a coherent initiative and revision in state management methods. That is resources should be divided equally and prevented to restrict by the wealthy. Another viable alternative is to raise the public welfare for the destitute family who does not earn money to meet their basic needs such as providing food.
To sum up, in spite of agriculture development, there are still a lot of people around the world who do not access a simple cuisine for several days due to infertile lands of where they live or also mismanagement. Reduce the cost of food and increase food production could be two effective solutions.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, still, such as, in spite of, to begin with, to sum up, that is to say

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1541.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08580858086 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85437529246 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613861386139 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.2222167622 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.733333333 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.46666666667 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236275348357 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0706192408846 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0621396684235 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136337996513 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.029525561845 0.056905535591 52% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.