In modern society, people tend to communicate through speech in preference to writing a letter or texting due to the prompt pace of life. Personally, I would opine that oral communication possesses more compensation compared with transcribed one.
First of all, spoken communication may immediately deliver information and receive responses in a short period. In various circumstances, individuals can raise requests for the opposite for the sake of seeking extensive and paramount knowledge whereas correspondences require plenty of time for preparations. To illustrate, students in a seminar may interrogate experts to fully comprehend the topic they are discussing instead of writing an email and looking forward to their replies. Since the shifts in tone of voice and vocal can effortlessly be recognized, emotions, as well as thoughts of a person, are possibly penetrated simultaneously. Hence, allowing individuals to improvise to maintain the conversation or satisfy the opposite one. For instance, if an individual speaks with a halt, he/she hesitates to stay communicating. Employers or leaders can also utilize the flexibility of speech for raising the spirits of subordinates. By contrast, handwritten documents may be the culprit of misunderstandings due to the lack of capability to convey mood and feelings.
In addition, speech communication skills that can be cultivated through daily discussions such as chatting with friends or talking to colleagues make it possible for individuals to effectively develop speech capacities without instructions and academic training. On the other hand, forms of writing such as writing a letter or an email sometimes involve overcritical regulations that are demanding to access and not available for certain individuals, especially those with low levels of literacy.
To sum up, verbal communication is significantly more advantageous than written communication. I strongly believe that communicating by texting and compiling documents will be out of date in the future.
Votes
Essay reference notes: This topic is refereed from another essay topic, developed by user: NhungVu201
Essay Categories
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, if, look, may, so, well, whereas, for instance, in addition, such as, as well as, first of all, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1727.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.71854304636 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.4661852455 2.80592935109 124% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629139072848 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 548.1 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.6573928372 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.357142857 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5714285714 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2857142857 7.06120827912 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128066221357 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0503771894267 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0724813254169 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106740833869 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.080227586037 0.056905535591 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.17 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.