There are many animals species in the world. Some people think we should for back animals from dying out, while others believe we should spend more time on problem of human beings. Discuss both sides and give you opinion.

Essay topics:

There are many animals species in the world. Some people think we should for back animals from dying out, while others believe we should spend more time on problem of human beings. Discuss both sides and give you opinion.

The planet earth is meant to be shared by all the species, plants, animals, human beings and so on. Advocates are of the view that endangered species should be saved from extinction. However, others postulate that one should work on the issue related to humankind rather than animals. This essay indents to delve into both the perspectives. Personally, I believe it's our moral duty to save the endangered creatures. I will elucidate the reasons in the following paragraphs.

Firstly, perilous animals are on the verge of extinction. If we will not protect them it would lead to ecological imbalance. With the burgeoning population of human beings, there is an increase in demand of space to live and global demand for commodities, such as palm oil and Soya beans, which leads to deforestation. As a result, animals lose their natural habitat and may not be able to survive. Therefore, it causes a disruption in ecosystem where most of the species die out and only few predators are left, does imbalancing the food chain. So, the natural phenomena of ecosystem gets disturbed and give rise to numerous diseases and natural disasters.

Furthermore, it is imperative to save wildlife as it plays a significant role in the medical research field. Scientists use fauna for the invention of various medicines and study of these animal is vital part of a research process as humans and animals share hundreds of illness and consequently, animals can act as models for the study of human illness. Therefore, wildlife is of great purpose from research point of view.

On the other hand, people assert that time should be devoted to human problem rather than animals. This is so because in today's world we are surrounded by so many issues that they becomes the priority of a nation. Individuals have to face water scarcity, pollution, health issues, malnutrition in children, degraded education system, etc. Now the death rate has far more exceeded the birthrate of human being which is an alarming issue. Therefore time should be allotted to such troubles.

To recapitulate, the aforementioned statements provide possible arguments in favor of preserving wildlife animals and importance of these endangered species. Apart from this the time can also be devoted to human problems as they are also connected to wildlife.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2018-05-18 erask123 84 view
Essays by user erask123 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 364, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...the perspectives. Personally, I believe its our moral duty to save the endangered c...
^^^
Line 3, column 60, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...animals are on the verge of extinction. If we will not protect them it would lead ...
^^
Line 7, column 181, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'become'
Suggestion: become
... surrounded by so many issues that they becomes the priority of a nation. Individuals h...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 438, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...human being which is an alarming issue. Therefore time should be allotted to such trouble...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, so, therefore, apart from, such as, as a result, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1944.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 380.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11578947368 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83596314867 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 176.041082164 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597368421053 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 622.8 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.4363066847 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.3636363636 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2727272727 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.04545454545 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274637267921 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0623670923754 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.048343113491 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129634197369 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0286410816686 0.056905535591 50% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.12 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.