There are more cars on the roads these days and more accidents are happening. As a result, some politicians have suggested that people should take regular driving tests throughout their lives, rather than one single test. What do you think are the advantages of repeat driving tests? Do these outweigh the disadvantages?
The growing number of cars and reckless driving are the major causes of increasing road accidents these days. Therefore, some people, as well as some politicians, express their view that repetitive driving tests, not just once to get the licence, should be in place. This essay presents my views in favour of the continuous testing process for driving with some appropriate reasons and examples.
The road safety in a country is a major concern and so is the obligation of politicians regarding this. This is because increasing vehicular movements can cause more accidents on the roads. Additionally, drivers, on the other hand, get outdated to incorporate with road rules accurately. For example, they may not be able to see the traffic signals and road signs easily when they get older. As a result, such drivers may potentially hit other moving vehicles and the people. Therefore, the repeat tests for driving, from time to time, will definitely improve the driving accuracy of people. Moreover, in many countries young drivers often do not abide by the traffic rules and having continuous tests would ensure their awareness in safe driving. Finally, when people will have to take driving tests periodically, they will less likely violate any traffic rule.
However, the multiple tests for driving in our lifetime may unnecessarily impose a burden. This is because we have to prepare for the test in order to renew the licence. Additionally, we will have to pay the exam fees every time which is considered an unwanted expense by many. As a result, many of us may tend to avoid the tests and this will lead to a situation that one day we will get pulled over and fined for an outdated licence. Therefore, continuous tests may not solve the raised issue easily while the drivers will always be under a pressure.
In conclusion, as reoccurring tests improve our driving accuracy, the benefits of such test surpass the drawbacks.
[Written by - Kris Nirvana]
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-09 | Saira Faiz | 73 | view |
| 2019-03-09 | Saira Faiz | 61 | view |
- Many people decide on a career path early in their lives and keep to it. This, they argue, leads to a more satisfying working life. To what extent do you agree with this view? What other things can people do in order to have a satisfying working life? 73
- Many people strive to maintain a successful career and happy family life at the same time. What problems can this situation create? What are the possible solutions? 67
- Some people say that non vegetarian food should be banned 58
- In many countries, there is a shortage of housing due to a growing population. Some people argue that new towns should be built in the countryside, others argue for the regeneration of cities. 73
- Children nowadays spend a great deal of time watching television However television cannot replace the book as a learning tool which is why children are less well educated today To what extent do you agree with this statement 82
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...some appropriate reasons and examples. The road safety in a country is a major ...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... less likely violate any traffic rule. However, the multiple tests for driving ...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ivers will always be under a pressure. In conclusion, as reoccurring tests impr...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1643.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0244648318 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65408380459 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553516819572 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.3756826881 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.2777777778 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1666666667 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.11111111111 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245571168428 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0734777317661 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0412620802643 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121301649264 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0656926259845 0.056905535591 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.54 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.