These days, in many countries fewer and fewer people want to become teachers, particularly in secondary schools. What are the reasons for this, and how could the problem be solved?
Nowadays, the number of people interested in schooling is decreasing significantly. Some sociologists claim that there are a great deal of reasons behind this negative tendency, but they don not have the faintest idea of how to solve this problem. In this essay, I will discuss the reasons for that little interest in teaching and propose some possible solutions to this.
Let us start by looking at the reasons why teaching at schools is less appealing. One cause of this low interest in becoming teachers is relatively small salary. Take secondary schools in Kazakhstan for example. The majority of students show the faintest signs of interest in teaching, because it is not as lucrative as other occupations. Another cause of fewer people wanting to make a living as teachers is ridiculously high workload. In addition to the non-competitive income, young people are unwilling to do teaching for a living, since teachers frequently have to work overtime and, therefore, hardly ever have spare time to relax. After analyzing these reasons, it is clear why young people find educating less appealing than other occupations.
Nonetheless, some politicians state that this difficulty can be tackled. They suggest the following steps to take. First of all, the way forward would be to raise the pay of schoolteachers. If the officials had increased the salaries earlier, then more young students would show larger interest in teaching at secondary schools. As a result, these schools would not be facing the scarcity of teachers now, as teachers could cover all their expenditure. Secondly, another solution is for the government to hire extra teaching assistants. If they take on more helpers for teachers, then it would reduce the burden of work on teachers, and, as a consequence, they would have more free time to unwind. After considering these solutions, it is obvious that it is probable to solve this problem.
In conclusion, even though there are plenty of factors why a small number of young people want to become teachers, I think that it is impossible to make teaching attractive, unless the government take the above-mentioned measures.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 132, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'deals'?
Suggestion: deals
...ciologists claim that there are a great deal of reasons behind this negative tendenc...
^^^^
Line 7, column 60, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
... though there are plenty of factors why a small number of young people want to become teachers, I...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, for example, i think, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1808.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 349.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18051575931 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91402461869 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532951289398 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 557.1 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 11.0 2.10420841683 523% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1990333348 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.1578947368 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3684210526 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.84210526316 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295457533279 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0836846778888 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0591009879999 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159837101018 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0567177058303 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.