The rate of organic food consumption is more than conventional food that shows individuals have more tendency to purchase organic food despite their high prices. Given that some of the justifications trigger to this trend, it seems to me that using organic food is more reasonable.
To begin with, some people eat organic food to preserve the environment and reduce the pollution of toxic chemicals used to produce conventional food. To build upon my point a little more, chemical fertilizers have been utilized to increase the plants’ growth and sprayed pesticides to eradicate pests as a result of which lands and roads not only are contaminated but it is also likely that vulnerable individuals, like elderly people and children, come down with these products produced in inorganic processes. Therefore, more people intend to use organic food which does not contain additives in order to be healthy and protect the environment.
Another reason that drives people to use more organic food is that these meals have more beneficial nutrients in comparison to food produced under conventional processes. For instance, vegetables and fruits whose growth were promoted by the inorganic processes and releasing hormones to live-stocks do not have nutritional value while organic food has been enriched by the array of vitamins and minerals and are fresher without any preservatives. In addition, the awareness of people about the importance of organic food in growing up their children has increased that causes to use more these meals
To sum up, most people follow GMO-free and organic diets to protect the environment and their selves from chemical items in processes of inorganic food and eat nutritious meals although they have to pay more price for them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 174, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...d despite their high prices. Given that some of the justifications trigger to this trend, i...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 577, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'using'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'cause' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: using
...heir children has increased that causes to use more these meals To sum up, most peo...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, therefore, while, for instance, in addition, as a result, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1486.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2695035461 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78768516372 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560283687943 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 16.0721442886 50% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 20.2975951904 172% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 98.2489662795 49.4020404114 199% => OK
Chars per sentence: 185.75 106.682146367 174% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.25 20.7667163134 170% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.625 7.06120827912 179% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.396423946958 0.244688304435 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.2209773891 0.084324248473 262% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104594908678 0.0667982634062 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.267077968726 0.151304729494 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0839706106034 0.056905535591 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.0 13.0946893788 160% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.49 50.2224549098 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.1 11.3001002004 160% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.88 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 10.1190380762 158% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.