These days, people work in more than one job, and often change career several times during their life. What are advantages and disadvantages of this?
Recently, I read an article about employment in Kazakhstan. In the article, some recruiters state that changes in career offer many advantages to employees. However, some social workers have arguments that such alterations also create many complications to them. In this essay, I will discuss both the pros and cons of this.
Let us start with benefits of changes in employment. The first positive side is that they frequently allow people to find better workplaces. Many workers are under dissatisfaction by undesired jobs, but with the help of frequent changes in career, they can seek better positions in a great variety of organizations. Another benefit is that they keep employees learning. Now that people do not stay in one job for a long time, they usually overcome plenty of challenges at new companies, which demand them to study new subjects. Therefore, after analyzing, it is clear that replacements in career are beneficial for employees.
Nevertheless, despite these positives, working in more job and changes in career has numerous repercussions for the laborer. Firstly, it usually damages their future work opportunities. Most employers are oriented on hiring those, who have worked for one job for many years, since the likelihood of their staying in the company is extremely high, but others with short-term contracts tend to look convincing. Secondly, it hinders their professional development. People, who frequently change their job, tend to lack competency in a certain area, because they have not worked in one position long enough to acquire both experience and skills in it. As a result, after considering, it is obvious that replacements in career is detrimental to career prospects.
In conclusion, even thought working in more than one position have a multitudes of benefits, it also cause many hindrances to employees.
- Some people believe that tourists should accept social and environmental responsibility. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- You took your family to a nearby restaurant. You were disappointed with the meal and wish to complain to the manager. Write a letter to the manager of the restaurant.In the letter: explain why you were at the restaurant (what event)describe the problems 84
- Some people believe that tourists should accept social and environmental responsibility. To what extent do you agree? 84
- Nowadays people have adopted an unhealthy lifestyle. Why do think this is? How could this problem be solved? 84
- Some people think that art is an essential subject for children at school while others think that it is a waste of time.Discuss both sides and give your own opinion. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 10, column 68, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a multitude' or simply 'multitudes'?
Suggestion: a multitude; multitudes
... working in more than one position have a multitudes of benefits, it also cause many hindran...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 102, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'causes'?
Suggestion: causes
... have a multitudes of benefits, it also cause many hindrances to employees.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, look, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1570.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34013605442 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01759536859 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608843537415 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.6697018456 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.3529411765 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2941176471 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.76470588235 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265371902733 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0753423022032 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0569718364185 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143453547575 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0579372461645 0.056905535591 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.