Having more money and less free time is better than earning less money and having more free time.Discuss both views and state your opinion.

Essay topics:

Having more money and less free time is better than earning less money and having more free time.

Discuss both views and state your opinion.

There is an issue about the balance between income and spare time. Some sociologists argue that people should concentrate on big salaries regardless of the leisure time scarcity, while others think that spare time is more valuable than big wages. This essay will discuss both opinions and agrees with the idea of the value of spare time.

Let us start with the reasons why some sociologists claim that earning more but possessing less leisure time is more beneficial. The first reason is that it provides a high standard of living. People with large salaries can afford a big house, a car as well as go on holidays once a year, so that they never think about living poverty. Another cause is that middle-class people can deposit more money for retirement. Workers with high income can secure a comfortable old ages, when they have paid all the bills. Furthermore, earning a high wage allow people to support relatives. They may make a financial backing to their, for example, either parents or siblings when they experience difficulties.

However, other sociologists argue that working a lot for better salary is less important than having more free time. They justify their point of view by the following arguments. First of all, people enjoy more time with the family. Workaholics often suffer from lack of time devoted to their children, while those, who are less obsessed with their work, are delighted at the balance of work and family life, no matter that they could earn higher income. Secondly, it allows to do other activities as part of daily routine. Parents, who spend less time at work, can do other things, such as go to the gym and decorating their apartments. Finally, it enables people travel around the world. Employees with temporary jobs can plan more interesting holidays in other parts of the globe.

In conclusion, although some sociologists advocate the idea of sacrificing free time for gaining larger incomes, I think that people should enjoy their life rather than completely commit themselves to work.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-07-21 cheetah 78 view
2019-06-10 Tolik 84 view
2019-03-24 Bhupesh 56 view
Essays by user Tolik :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 224, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f living. People with large salaries can afford a big house, a car as well as go ...
^^
Line 3, column 473, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'age'?
Suggestion: age
...igh income can secure a comfortable old ages, when they have paid all the bills. Fur...
^^^^
Line 5, column 475, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'doing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'allow' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: doing
...earn higher income. Secondly, it allows to do other activities as part of daily routi...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, while, for example, i think, in conclusion, such as, as well as, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1700.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 339.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01474926254 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52471877416 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581120943953 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 529.2 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.368477163 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.4736842105 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8421052632 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.26315789474 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301427956287 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0865298856772 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0897072740854 0.0667982634062 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168621762097 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0527176007378 0.056905535591 93% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.