Today, the younger and older generations are in the same workplace. Is this more an advantage or more disadvantage?

With the passage of time; experience and perfection come along. Older employees working in the same vertical from a long time certainly have more experience as compared to new employees. My conscious forces me to think about advantages which involves dynamic experience and personal clientele.

To begin with, one of the most evident advantages of working both the generations altogether is a more dynamic experience older employees have in the industry. Modern life presents us with an overwhelming number of qualities which can be seen mostly in younger generations such as smartness and fast learning. Whereas employees working in a particular vertical become expertise and can guide the juniors colleagues much better. For instance, younger employees with high energy and smart mind can attract more clients but when it comes to the technicality of a product always need the help of an experienced person. Also, there are many areas where experience matters with smartness and credibility such as politics. Mr Narendra Modi is a perfect example of this.

Alongside, the influence of the greater experience, personal clientele cannot be belittled. It has been seen that young employee especially the new joining finds challenging in forming personal relationships with the customer, while experienced people have their own clientele who usually refer them to other customers. To exemplify, the experienced person has already proven the service to many customers and can get the leads from enormous sources, whereas newly joined employee always try to find the leads through untrusted resources. So without proper guidance from older generations younger would not be able to reach the desired destination.

Put comprehensively, as a matter of front facing and leading the young esteem is the key where customer relationship and guidance of an experienced person is essential.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, whereas, while, for instance, such as, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1595.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46232876712 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94073210771 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606164383562 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.120004777 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.928571429 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8571428571 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.07142857143 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181835411268 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0607784957744 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.067745883826 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0984529089114 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0649309355167 0.056905535591 114% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.