Nowadays by growing the tourism industry in all part of the world, a wide range of issues and problems like air pollution, water pollution and so on have been appeared.
In this essay we will try to discuss possible policy solutions that can be applied by governments to reduce negative impacts of fast growing of tourism industry, such as increasing taxes on transport especially air transport or even accommodation and tourism attraction points like museums.
If we compare the number of people who like to travel and visit far places with one or two decades ago, we will see a huge increment in this number. This is not only because of effects of social media and the internet, but also by further development of air travel industry, the prices for flights have been decreased in fact. In addition to that we must consider the impact of competition between travel agencies in reducing prices to absorb more customers.
Many believe that local governments must control the number of tourists that visit a particular region in each year. Making laws and regulations is one of the options in the hand of governments. However, governments can increase the taxes on the resources that tourists like to enjoy from. For example, they can impose extra taxes for those who like to visit the beaches. In this way, authorities can use this extra money to compensate negative effects of tourism industry in their regions.
In conclusion, growing of tourism industry and increase in the number of travellers, caused many pollution issues in different part of the world. However, local governments have to reduce negative effects of this development by controlling the number of travellers, and one of the tools in the hand of governments is imposing extra taxes on flights, accommodations and so on.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 460, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ducing prices to absorb more customers. Many believe that local governments must...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1495.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77698734356 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.498327759197 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 469.8 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.6054154885 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.583333333 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9166666667 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.08333333333 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191154648679 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0695494215958 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0523512883298 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11577944684 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.044460407163 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 9.78957915832 179% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.