Using a computer every day can have more negative than positive effects on your children.
Do you agree or disagree?
In this 21st century, technological gadgets becomes the necessity of all age groups, especially blooming buds. I partially agree with the notion because new generation gaining many benefits as well as influencing their overall health as a negative consequence of these machineries.
There are multifarious points to endorse the above statement , firstly, daily usage of technical gadgets such as computer contributes in making poor health of kids. To be specific, the screen of laptops emit rays that effect eyes results in weak eyesight and many other health issues. For instance, a research study depicts that children who use computer for more than five hours on regular basis suffers from headaches and other optical aliments. Secondly, social contact of teenagers vanished due to their more attraction towards computers. Moreover, they have no time to communicate with their family, friends and in fact show no interest in physical activities. Consequently, technology impacts the lifestyle badly.
In contrary to this, manifold attributes support the positives of the central idea. To embark with, First and foremost, daily use of computer helps kids not only to absorb sufficient knowledge of the worldly affairs but also provide a channel for upgrading the leraning method as most of the courses are now online so, tutors prefer to send study material online. However, pertinent information about the course curriculum available on the internet. To demonstrate, now, every student have their own computer for doing the assignments and completion of syllabus in most of the schools of the world.
To recapitulate, usage of computer has more weightage of merits as compared to demerits. Hence, I believe that by correcting the negatives, one can opt the positive ones and makes wise of technology.
- Using a computer every day can have more negative than positive effects on your children.Do you agree or disagree? 89
- Some think that these environmental problems are too big for individuals to be solved, while others think that individuals cannot solve these environmental problems unless governments make some action. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 78
- The company you work for is planning to provide special training for staff. Your duty is to find out if the local conference centre has suitable facilities in order to hold the training. Write a letter to the manager of the conference centre. In your l 89
- Some people think that the government should give money to creative people, such as artists and musicians. To what extent do you agree? 78
- You have a full-time job and you are also doing a part-time evening course.You now find that you cannot continue the course.Write a letter to your teachers. In your letter•describe the situation•explain why you cannot continue at this time•say what 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 61, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...us points to endorse the above statement , firstly, daily usage of technical gadg...
^^
Line 3, column 72, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o endorse the above statement , firstly, daily usage of technical gadgets such as...
^^
Line 5, column 63, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...anifold attributes support the positives of the central idea. To embark with, Fir...
^^
Line 7, column 44, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...recapitulate, usage of computer has more weightage of merits as compared to demer...
^^
Line 7, column 175, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tives, one can opt the positive ones and makes wise of technology.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, hence, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, for instance, in fact, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1531.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40989399293 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84076817021 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.689045936396 0.561755894193 123% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.6569317659 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.357142857 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2142857143 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0714285714 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206715639122 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0521225446039 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0446816925473 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100298877829 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0322566093223 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.54 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.