Nowadays, how to take advantage of computers is a heated topic of controversy. Many parents claim that using computers regularly can be more harmful to children than useful. In this short essay, I will elaborate on why I disagree with this statement.
Good or bad, computers, as the mother of modern technologies, are getting more important every day, and it is expected that they play the biggest role in our future, thus, learning how to work with them is crucial. In the 21st Century, the use of computers has become widespread in every aspect of human life such as education, work, communication, etc. Therefore, a lack of knowledge may lead to less chance of success in future. Hence, not only we shouldn't keep our children away from computers, but we should encourage them to learn how to take advantage of computers. For instance, when I was a kid, my parents bought me a computer and encouraged me to learn how to work with it. I got engaged with it after a while and learnt many software like Microsoft Office, Autocad, etc, which later helped me to get a great design job opportunity in a very top-notch company.
On the other hand, computers, like any other technology, can have some demerits for everybody, especially children. Children may get addicted to harmful content on computers that not only will waste their time, but they can cause some serious damage to their mental health, relationships, etc. Also, the prolonged use of computers can lead to social isolation and loneliness, as individuals may spend more time interacting with screens than with other people.
In conclusion, although computers have some potentially negative impacts, children need to learn them, if they want to have a better future. Furthermore, there are some techniques to mitigate downcasts by supervising children while they are using computers. As a result, in my opinion, striking a balance between encouraging them to use computers and keeping them away from unsuitable content is the best approach.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 420, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...edge may lead to less chance of success in future. Hence, not only we shouldnt keep our c...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 450, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...f success in future. Hence, not only we shouldnt keep our children away from computers, ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 731, Rule ID: MANY_FEW_UNCOUNTABLE[2]
Message: Use 'much' or 'little' with uncountable nouns.
Suggestion: much; little
...ngaged with it after a while and learnt many software like Microsoft Office, Autocad...
^^^^
Line 2, column 731, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun software seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much software', 'a good deal of software'.
Suggestion: much software; a good deal of software
...ngaged with it after a while and learnt many software like Microsoft Office, Autocad, etc, wh...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, may, so, therefore, thus, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1670.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 333.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01501501502 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83319925332 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57957957958 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.915957224 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.333333333 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0666666667 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238423066682 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.080347726307 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.066066931395 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155463521197 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.042791775018 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.