Dear Neighbors,
I am writing this letter regarding the accident that recently happened in the underground parking. To avoid similar accidents in the future, we need to collaborate.
Let me shortly write about what happened. Monday morning, when I went to the parking to take my car, I realized a side window of the car had been broken, and some items had been missed. According to police, this neighbourhood is crowded in which many homeless people are living on the streets. Thereby, in cold weather like these days, they are looking for places like underground parking to sneak in and keep themselves warm. Referring to the police officer I talked to, this is an everyday occurrence accident in this area. Thus, we need to keep strangers away from the parking area.
In this regard, I have a few suggestions that may help us to solve this issue. As it takes time that the parking door gets closed automatically, most of the time, when we leave, it remains open for a while. As a result, others can easily get in. Thus, I suggest installing a remote control door closer system that would let us close the door by remote control right after leaving the parking. Second, as this is private parking, if you see a stranger person, it is better to ask them to leave.
To discuss this issue and possible solutions, I suggest having a meeting ASAP. I would be free on Thursday and Friday evenings. Please let me know what time will work for you to schedule a gathering.
I am looking forward to hearing from you,
Yours Faithfully,
Masoud
- TPO 53 3
- Some people think that we should keep away from others to improve our relationship, because being away from people reminds us of how important they are. Others think we should always stay with others to have good relationship because we can communicate wi 73
- Some people like to buy and eat their meals at restaurants frequently while others like to do this at home. Which do you prefer? Why? 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The most important characteristic to a successful politician or leader is good communication skills. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Sometimes people think nowadays the media (TV, newspaper, Internet) are less concerned about the accuracy of news than in the past, and the incorrect information may cause more problem to the public. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, may, regarding, second, so, thus, while, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.48453608247 120% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 4.92783505155 142% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 5.05154639175 79% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.03092783505 231% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 40.0 32.9175257732 122% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 26.3917525773 133% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.85567010309 26% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1271.0 937.175257732 136% => OK
No of words: 271.0 206.0 132% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69003690037 4.54256449028 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 3.78020617076 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56182655491 2.54303337028 101% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 127.690721649 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623616236162 0.622605031667 100% => OK
syllable_count: 389.7 290.88556701 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.41237113402 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.13402061856 164% => OK
Article: 0.0 0.824742268041 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 1.83505154639 327% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.463917525773 216% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 1.44329896907 346% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 12.6804123711 134% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 16.3608247423 92% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.0664930916 44.8134815571 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.7647058824 76.5299724578 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9411764706 16.8248392259 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.64705882353 4.34317383033 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.29896907216 116% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 7.41237113402 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.49484536082 334% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.94845360825 101% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121086044854 0.216113520407 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0373305114272 0.0766984524023 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0507586152377 0.0603063233224 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0656931274591 0.12726935374 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0371705890416 0.0580467560999 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.6 8.37731958763 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 70.7449484536 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 7.45979381443 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 8.71597938144 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 7.59969072165 104% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 41.2886597938 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 8.62886597938 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 8.54432989691 94% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 8.15463917526 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.