A considerable percentage of citizens often have the mindset of limiting healthcare and financial supports to only a closed community. However, I personally think that the lives of those beyond national borders should also be handled with absolute respect and faithfulness.
To an extent, it is acceptable that the government should provide an adequate source of medical and financial protection to their fellow citizens. Such a naturally resourceful country would be able to benefit a lot more in terms of local industries and national economy if the budget is allocated directly for repairing persisting domestic problems, like violence and homelessness. In other words, without having to invest much of the national financial resources to less-developed countries, the economic growth would double and the construction of infrastructures would be more efficiently paced. Moreover, due to the fact that domestic problems are conveniently placed on our doorstep, keeping things under control becomes much more manageable, and supporting the local misfortuned could be done in a variety of ways. With all the reasons mentioned above, it is understandable why people seem to prioritize domestic supports.
However, it would be an insult to equality if the less-fortuned living across borders are not treated the same way. One of the reasons why developed countries should pay more attention to those inhabiting poorly-developed areas is that the problems in those areas are significantly alarming, yet really simple technology would have easily resolved them. For instance, African countries have been facing the toughest of diseases, which took the lives of millions. However, it is surprising that modern-day antibiotics are more than enough to drastically bring that number down. In addition, due to the fact that we are all human beings, we take pride in our culture and obligation to treat everyone equally and adequately. Simply speaking, we are responsible for creating a large community of different nationalities, beliefs, and ethics, instead of a passive and closed community. Without each other’s help, we cannot improve technology, and disregard global conflicts.
In conclusion, while it is visually evident that the current world’s situation is preventing us from supporting everyone equally, it is crucial to know that we can never let geographical and national borders be an excuse for leaving behind people that are in need.
- People are living in a throwaway society which means people use things in a short time then throw them away What are its causes and what impacts can it have 80
- Some countries achieve international sports by building specialised facilities to train top athletes instead of providing sports facilities that everyone can use Do you think this is positive or negative development Discuss both views and give your opinio 73
- There are many different types of music in the world today Why do we need music Is the traditional music of a country more important than the international music that is heard everywhere nowadays 84
- An increasing number of professionals such as doctors and teachers are leaving their own poorer countries to work in developed countries What problems does this cause What solutions can you suggest to deal with this situation 78
- The graph below shows the number of hours per day on average that children spent watching television between 1950 and 2010 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, really, so, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2080.0 1615.20841683 129% => OK
No of words: 376.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53191489362 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40348946061 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09769533484 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590425531915 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 652.5 506.74238477 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.2041061275 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.666666667 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0666666667 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.93333333333 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192251701692 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0574198453389 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0446172187907 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10688358517 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0305132131202 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.09 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.87 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 78.4519038076 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.