Wealthy nation should assisst poorer countries with humanitarian relief during natural disaster
Do you agree or disagree?
It is stated that rich countries should support poorer ones which are suffering from natural disaster as an action of humanitarianism. This essay totally disagrees the statement because wealthy nations sometimes have the same issue and they have to solve it too. In addition, countries which count as wealthy ones does not mean they have unlimited deal of money to supply poorer ones during hard time with subsidies.
Not only developing countries but also developed ones have to confront severe impacts of the catastrophe. The government of those countries are up to ears with the work needed to be done in order to get through the hard time so that paying attention to other countries' problems is non sense. It is extremely impossible for them to relieve both their countries and poorer ones during crisis. For example, Japan, which is a highly developed countries, has to face up with numerous disasters throughout the history. In 2010s, they were so busy reconstructing their cities infrastructure after the a tsunami and an earthquake that they could not subside Philipines, which was also damaged heavily after a massive storm.
The world economy becomes increasingly chaotic. Even countries which are considered as rich ones are also in economic difficulties. Those developed countries should always give preference to their interior tasks so that sometimes they are not able to satisfy developing nations calling-out for subsidies. For example, in August this year, the USA did ignore the UK request , which asked for medical supplements.
To conclude, poorer countries should not be helped by rich ones during natural catastrophes due to the fact that the same problem may occur to the wealthy nations and monetary issue is so complicated that so,sometimes it is hard for them to donate money for other countries.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-10-18 | tranminh14032003 | 61 | view |
| 2018-07-15 | Ragesh R | 63 | view |
- Wealthy nation should assisst poorer countries with humanitarian relief during natural disaster Do you agree or disagree 61
- You should spend about 40 minutes on this task Write about the following topic Buying things on the Internet such as books air tickets and groceries is becoming more and more popular Do the advantages of shopping in this way outweigh the disadvantages Giv 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 514, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'In the 2010s'.
Suggestion: In the 2010s
...erous disasters throughout the history. In 2010s, they were so busy reconstructing their...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 591, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'a' is left.
Suggestion: the; a
...cting their cities infrastructure after the a tsunami and an earthquake that they cou...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 373, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... year, the USA did ignore the UK request , which asked for medical supplements. ...
^^
Line 7, column 208, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , sometimes
...monetary issue is so complicated that so,sometimes it is hard for them to donate money for...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, as to, for example, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1540.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22033898305 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80651959336 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538983050847 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.5780604393 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.461538462 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6923076923 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.23076923077 7.06120827912 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22210063165 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0816419750802 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0629274647893 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151324474068 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0658863951501 0.056905535591 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.