Wealthy nations should assist poorer countries during natural disasters. Do you agree or disagree?
During the Natural Disasters, Poor countries should be provided Humanitarian help by wealthy nations. This essay agrees with this statement because they have enough resources to do so and they can afford to help those in need.
In situations persisting to natural disasters, Wealthy nations have enough resources to aid countries which are underprivileged. Unlike rich countries, Poor countries do not have enough man power and resources to rescue themselves during disasters. Wealthy nations can divert some of their man power and machinery, as poor countries do not have proper resources, any help provided would make a great impact on the livelihood.
Developed nations have adequate economy to help the poor nations, They have good economy which can be used to support other countries during natural disasters. Wealthy nations can help in providing basic facilities during emergency situations as it does not hurt their economy much. A research analysis found that Financial assistance provided by the European onion helped played an important role in rebuilding of Indonesia after the Earthquake.
To Conclude, Humanitarian relief to underprivileged countries should be provided by Wealthy countries during National Disasters because they have enough resources and are well-financed, aiding these countries does not hurt the economy of developed nations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-22 | Shahla | 89 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | Kazimobarak | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | Harsimran0814 | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-15 | mohaimen | 84 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | shivangi patel | 56 | view |
- Prevention is better than cure Researching and treating diseases are too costly so it would be better to invest in preventative measures 91
- Countries should spend more money on trains rather than new roads Do you agree or disagree 63
- Prevention is better than cure.Researching and treating diseases are too costly so it would be better to invest in preventative measures. 73
- Countries should spend more money on trains rather than new roads .Do you agree or disagree? 56
- Wealthy nations should assist poorer countries during natural disasters. Do you agree or disagree? 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1164.0 1615.20841683 72% => OK
No of words: 205.0 315.596192385 65% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.67804878049 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 4.20363070211 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91532699184 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 176.041082164 60% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.517073170732 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 358.2 506.74238477 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.0549600632 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.333333333 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7777777778 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.888888888889 7.06120827912 13% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.322804004957 0.244688304435 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.161020197343 0.084324248473 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0825925945841 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219470102097 0.151304729494 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0305368096965 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.96 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.