When designing a building, the most important factor is intended use of the building rather than its outward appearance. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Building isn't of any use if cannot be used for the purpose it was designed for. Scenic beauty of building is important to attract people but people will lose interest if they don't find any it useful from utility perspective. So usefulness is as important as the aesthetic beauty of the building.

To start with, a man without a purpose and building without being useful are directionless. If the building cannot met it's announced objectives then it will be of no use to people and howsoever beautiful its appearance or ambiance is building will ultimately lead to lose it's importance soon. If Indian restaurants, for instance, cannot provide Indian cuisine foods then people will never prefer to visit it howsoever beautiful it may be. Similarly, if a museum fails to explain the saga of famous things then it will be devastated soon because people will never visit them and ultimately with no earnings museums cannot survive longer. So in order to buildings to survive and earn effectively it should have relevant factors for which it was made else these will vanish soon.

Furthermore, to bring liveliness to these buildings appearance and attractiveness play a vital role. If building is not beautiful looking then people will not even consider to visit it once. For example, Taj Mahal in India is famous for it's scenic views where people wait till evening just to see the glimpse of the Taj in the moon light which gives them such a satisfaction. So to attract majority of the people building has to be good looking.

To recapitulate, utility and aesthetic appearance both are important for proper functioning of the building. If either of them is missing building will be considered incomplete and cannot perform the way it can perform. Aesthetic appearance is required to attract customers while utility is required so that people can make full use of for what is was made for.

Votes
Average: 6.4 (3 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 10, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
Building isnt of any use if cannot be used for the pu...
^^^^
Line 1, column 176, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...e but people will lose interest if they dont find any it useful from utility perspec...
^^^^
Line 3, column 167, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...ounced objectives then it will be of no use to people and howsoever beautiful its a...
^^^
Line 5, column 43, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'buildings'' or 'building's'?
Suggestion: buildings'; building's
...rthermore, to bring liveliness to these buildings appearance and attractiveness play a vi...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 165, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[3]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'consider visiting'.
Suggestion: consider visiting
...tiful looking then people will not even consider to visit it once. For example, Taj Mahal in Indi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 346, Rule ID: VBZ_VBD[1]
Message: Did you mean 'it'?
Suggestion: it
...at people can make full use of for what is was made for.
^^
Line 7, column 349, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...people can make full use of for what is was made for.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, look, may, similarly, so, then, while, as to, for example, for instance, to start with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1574.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.934169279 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74951475166 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.489028213166 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 500.4 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.7126835183 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.933333333 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2666666667 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140677274165 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0637442427006 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0501721415466 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101679208815 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0451556634998 0.056905535591 79% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.