When designing a building, the most important factor is intended use of the building rather than its outward appearance. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Nowadays, design of building plays a great role. Building isn't of any use if cannot be used for the purpose it is designed for. Scenic beauty of building is important to attract people but people will lose interest if they don't find it relevant from utility perspective. So usefulness is as important as the aesthetic beauty of the building.

To start with, a man without a purpose and building without being useful is directionless. If the building cannot met it's announced objectives then it will be of no use to people and howsoever beautiful its appearance or ambiance is building will ultimately lead to lose it's importance. If Indian restaurants, for instance, cannot provide Indian cuisine foods then people will never prefer to visit it, no matter how beautiful it is. Similarly, if a museum fails to explain the saga of famous things then it will be devastated soon because people will never visit them and ultimately with no earnings museums cannot survive longer. So in order to buildings to survive and earn effectively it should have relevant factors for which it was made else these will vanish soon. Architects plays a vital role in designing of building as they are expert of the domain and they align design according to usefulness.

Furthermore, to bring liveliness to these buildings appearance and attractiveness play a vital role. People nowadays, prefer to judge things/building by its look because it creates a long lasting image in the mind. If design of building is good then obviously recall value will be high. If building is not beautiful looking then people will not even consider to visit it once. For example, Taj Mahal in India is famous for it's scenic views where people wait till evening just to see the glimpse of the Taj in the moon light which gives them such a satisfaction. Just because of design Taj Mahal is among the seven wonders of the world. So to attract majority of the people building has to be designed in such a manner that it becomes worth visiting it.

To recapitulate, utility and aesthetic appearance both are important for proper functioning of the building. If either of them is missing building will be considered incomplete and cannot perform the way it can perform. Aesthetic appearance is required to attract customers while utility is required so that people can make full use of for what is was made for.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 59, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...f building plays a great role. Building isnt of any use if cannot be used for the pu...
^^^^
Line 1, column 224, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...e but people will lose interest if they dont find it relevant from utility perspecti...
^^^^
Line 3, column 166, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...ounced objectives then it will be of no use to people and howsoever beautiful its a...
^^^
Line 5, column 43, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'buildings'' or 'building's'?
Suggestion: buildings'; building's
...rthermore, to bring liveliness to these buildings appearance and attractiveness play a vi...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 216, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...eates a long lasting image in the mind. If design of building is good then obvious...
^^
Line 5, column 351, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[3]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'consider visiting'.
Suggestion: consider visiting
...tiful looking then people will not even consider to visit it once. For example, Taj Mahal in Indi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 346, Rule ID: VBZ_VBD[1]
Message: Did you mean 'it'?
Suggestion: it
...at people can make full use of for what is was made for.
^^
Line 7, column 349, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...people can make full use of for what is was made for.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, look, similarly, so, then, while, as to, for example, for instance, to start with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 13.1623246493 190% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1972.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 404.0 315.596192385 128% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88118811881 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48327461151 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73095978709 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.472772277228 0.561755894193 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 622.8 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.4 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.6 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.15 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169014058963 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0685159434412 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0421475016688 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123585146106 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0410202127864 0.056905535591 72% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.