While recruiting a new employee, the employer should pay more attention to their personal qualities, rather than qualifications and experience. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There is no doubt; getting employment requires various skills that are imperative such as time management, past experiences, academics and so on. According to some people, during the hiring process the recruiter ought to look for the personal attributes of applicants instead of their experience and qualifications. I disagree with this viewpoint because a qualified candidate possesses the right skill set and insight which a non-qualified individual may lack despite having an amicable personality. Secondly, an experienced person could bring new technological advancement and has a lot to offer to the organization. I will support my viewpoint in the subsequent paragraphs.
To commence with, first and foremost, a well-qualified person possesses the right skill set and knowledge required to land a job. As this is a world of specialisation, recruiters prefer to appoint a person with numerous skills instead of interpersonal qualities. For instance, corporate tend to hire only those individuals who attained their degree in a specific field as they feel that the person could perform better than a less-qualified individual.
Furthermore, it is thought by some recruiters that an experienced candidate could give new technological progression to the organisation. All the methodologies and processes that an experienced employee brings with them help the firm to ameliorate their current business process to fetch more profits. For example, start-ups prefer to hire people who familiar with the business models of their competitors. Admittedly, people with pleasant personalities are good for handling clients. Personally I believe that personal attributes are crucial only in positions that require a lot of l interactions with the public. For back-end jobs experience and academic qualifications are more important.
In conclusion, it is obvious that a degree-holder has the right skill sets and know-how to perform his duties better. Moreover, an experienced champ perhaps offers a new formula to maximize the company’s earnings. Amicable personality traits are certainly beneficial; however, they are never a substitute for academic qualifications or work experience.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-11 | elanglue | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-02 | Kanchan Sagar | 84 | view |
| 2019-09-03 | jakirph365 | 84 | view |
| 2019-09-02 | noora.qureshi | 61 | view |
| 2019-08-30 | Android | 73 | view |
- Vaccinating children against preventable diseases is not only unnecessary but also dangerous. Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree. 61
- The Internet contains a lot of information that can help people however sometimes the information is inaccurate or wrong Do you Agree or Disagree 63
- Some people believe that they have right to keep all their earnings and can neglect taxes. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this? 89
- Nowadays sending children to boarding school (either in other countries or in their own countries)is becoming popular. Why is it? Is it a positive development? 78
- Due to poorer countries experiencing a brain drain they are seeing many professionals such as doctors and teachers leaving to work in more developed countries What problems do this cause What solutions can be suggested to deal with this situation 74
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 108, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experiences'.
Suggestion: experiences
...are imperative such as time management, past experiences, academics and so on. According to some...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 348, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a familiar'.
Suggestion: who is a familiar
...xample, start-ups prefer to hire people who familiar with the business models of their compe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, look, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, no doubt, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1869.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.75076923077 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.41815549416 2.80592935109 122% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590769230769 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 576.0 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.1280881632 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.941176471 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1176470588 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.58823529412 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155147628833 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0498655251373 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0297831856046 0.0667982634062 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.096200152117 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0149931273566 0.056905535591 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.07 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.