Women and men are commonly seen as having different strengths and weaknesses. Is it right to exclude males or females from certain professions because of their gender?
Nature has made males and females with a different set of characteristics and these contrasts in feature make them adept at certain tasks, according to the common belief of the society. However, in this era, when gender equality has already been accepted and both males and females proved that they can be equally fit in any job, excluding a certain gender from a particular profession is no longer an acceptable and wise option.
To begin with, according to the common social dogma, women should stay at home, take care of the kitchen and up-bring children while men should have a career, earn money and take important decisions for the family. Though this was a widely accepted idea in the past, it has started changing and women in certain professions have outnumbered their male counterparts. For instance, the number of female teachers has already exceeded the number of male teachers in many countries according to an online report. On the other hand, men have proven that they can be as good as females in child care and nursing. The time has come to forget the old dogma and accept the fact that gender equality is longer an option, but a must in job sectors. Women are no longer ready to be confined within the walls while males have forgotten their prejudices and started switching the roles.
Furthermore, while selecting someone for a job, the authority should look for a suitable candidate and that person can be either a male or female. The widely held belief that women are less suitable in professions that require physical strength, logical reasoning, mental power, diplomacy and dealing with others is no longer acceptable in the society. Many female presidents and prime ministers in the world have proved that it is a baseless theory and tech giants lie Google, Microsoft, Facebook and Yahoo! Do not employ people based on their gender, rather they put more emphasis on someone’s quality and potential.
To draw a conclusion to the discussion, despite some physical differences, both men and women have similar talents and possibility. The old dogma of gender-based role is no longer tolerable in the modern era and this is why someone’s talent and skill should be the primary reasons for the suitability for a job, not the gender of the candidate.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-16 | SanFer | 84 | view |
| 2019-03-09 | Saira Faiz | 73 | view |
| 2019-03-09 | Saira Faiz | 73 | view |
| 2019-03-09 | Saira Faiz | 56 | view |
| 2019-03-09 | Saira Faiz | 78 | view |
- All over the world, the rich are becoming richer and the poor are becoming poorer. What problems does this cause? How can we overcome the problems of poverty? 61
- You have recently attended a job interview which went well, but you are still waiting for the decision. Write a letter to HR manager of the company and say. Give details of the JobWhy do you think the interview went well?why do you need to know the result 87
- Students from rural areas often find it difficult to access university education. Some people think that universities should make it easier for them to access higher education. 73
- Some of the methods used in advertising are unethical and unacceptable in today’s society.To what extent do you agree with this view? 73
- Some people consider computers to be more of a hindrance than a help. Others believe that they have greatly increased human potential. How could computers be considered a hindrance? 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, look, so, while, for instance, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 10.4138276553 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1906.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 384.0 315.596192385 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96354166667 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66632077835 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526041666667 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 605.7 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.8234753728 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.615384615 106.682146367 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.5384615385 20.7667163134 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.23076923077 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294939841618 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101228319917 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0538992897688 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175208402614 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0647802013336 0.056905535591 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 50.2224549098 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.08 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 9.78957915832 184% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.