It is often observed that the way we used to portray the work areas, with the immerging technology and daily updations in policies have changed. This is the main factors people now do not feel secure only in one type of jobs, and more open to the other opportunities as well. In this essay, the driving force for the same and possible solutions will be discussed.
To embark upon, previously the employers do admire the loyalty and courage of their workforce, they always provide the environment that was suitable for productivity and health, even people used to spend whole life working the same job. However, gradually the industrialization and new technology stimulated a culture of replacing human efforts and increased working hours. Certainly, workers looked for some other situations hence ended up having different skills, because survival anyhow is utmost. In an empirical article of prominent "The Times", ascertained that the need for advancement in our education system apparent after every decade, as now people are striving for more approachable skills to get jobs. Furthermore, corporate sector policies like a certain pay scale, extended working hours, the pressure of capturing the targets, and many more create a disbalance in personal and professional life.
Nowadays, we can see that the new branches of working opportunities are evident, like a career in adventure sports, arts, science, astronomy, social media to name a few, so the areas to explore are no more limited, hence, there are a number of choices to grab on. Apart from this, as today's generation need to be more flexible with technology and policies at work. There is no room for conventional limited methodology, time is demanding imagination and creativity in every sector, also efforts are being appreciated with several competitions and awards at working culture environment. In a recent survey by London's "Oxford University", around sixty percent of the population now do not have insecurity factor for jobs the main reason is courage to face the risks, now market have increased and they can become entrepreneurs. Certainly, skills with a combination of creative thinking and ready to face any challenge or risk are the main keys for future jobs.
To conclude, change is the necessity of time, it could be technology, policies or any other factor but the encouragement and creativity is the utmost factor for future jobs.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, however, if, look, so, well, apart from, as to, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2051.0 1615.20841683 127% => OK
No of words: 390.0 315.596192385 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25897435897 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44391917772 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97799181328 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 176.041082164 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592307692308 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 667.8 506.74238477 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.9039354608 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.5 106.682146367 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8571428571 20.7667163134 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275891899692 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0907669427853 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0418523974566 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16344769514 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0507807423456 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.0946893788 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.