It has been formed a certain circumstance that we have to make many presentations during each semester. Presentations also account for a large part of our final grades, in other words, we have to prepare presentations carefully and revise them again and again. This also gives rise to our focus on doing a presentation, when some negative behaviors should be avoided such as low voice, stammer and so on. To enhance our presentation skills we can watch recordings by ourselves. Admittedly, doing so could superficially amplify defects and show how embarrassed we are when doing presentations. However, from my standpoint, only other people’s advice can really excavate the potential questions and have a significant influence on our behaviors.
To begin with, discussions can provide us with more novel ideas from others and lead to some real breakthroughs for our presentations. In our minds, we are always brilliant that shadows some weaknesses if we only retrospect videos independently. Others are good at finding errors because they can look at the presentation at various angles. In this way, some groundbreaking suggestions can be brought up with which we can promote skills apparently. Take me as an example, I have made so many presentations when I was in university. Although I endeavor to do a job, I cannot get ideal grades on my presentations and I really believe I have presented content perfectly. Then my friends who have listened to my speeches propose that I should make this job active, thus I add some videos and pictures to help me illustrate my point and have interactions with my classmates. Consequently, I got my expected grade. We could certainly get constructive ideas from friends, classmates or our teachers.
In addition, we can obtain motivations from others during discussion. Indeed, we are also trapped in negative feelings or get tired when we do something alone. But encourage could be transmitted to you when you do the task in a group. Hence, we can be motived to prompt much more than personal work that we get bored easily and can not move on. Furthermore, since our workmates can also acquire a positive response from us, they have a passion for looking for more potential weaknesses and put up more recommendations.
Lastly, the relationship between others and us becomes closer and we can even make more friends. We begin to learn more about other people vice versa due to discussion. Moreover, some strangers who have been ignored by us before occur in our daily life. Similar interests attract us and make us get close to each other. Example?
In sum, I unswervingly agree to ask for other people to get suggestions about the presentation since they can point out more creative ideas and motive us to keep improve which bring more friends to us. It is true that society is like a big net and we connect closely with other citizens, thus we can not develop individually. In my opinion, a discussion is the best way to study.
- Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole 85
- After doing a presentation you want to identify your weaknesses and improve your skills Which of the following ways do you think is better 1 Review your recording alone 2 Let classmates or colleagues give suggestions and discuss about them 95
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 750, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...significant influence on our behaviors. To begin with, discussions can provide u...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, consequently, furthermore, hence, however, if, lastly, look, moreover, really, so, then, thus, in addition, such as, in my opinion, in other words, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 9.8082437276 194% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 71.0 43.0788530466 165% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2487.0 1977.66487455 126% => OK
No of words: 501.0 407.700716846 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96407185629 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.73107062784 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03650878085 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 266.0 212.727598566 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530938123752 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 784.8 618.680645161 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.5620909894 48.9658058833 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.1111111111 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5555555556 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25925925926 5.45110844103 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0785120435366 0.236089414692 33% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0277768794209 0.076458572812 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0377668254871 0.0737576698707 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0510208038681 0.150856017488 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0230311027906 0.0645574589148 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 11.7677419355 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 86.8835125448 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.