After making a presentation in class, you want to evaluate it. Which of the following do you think would be better for you?
1. Watch the recording by yourself
2. Invite other attenders to discuss and give opinions.
Some times, in the classes, the majority of students have a presentation in the class, which is needed evaluated by someone expert or be a professor at the university. It is essential that this evaluation occurs through a procedure like inviting more teachers and professors for it, which can be beneficial form two aspects as personal characteristics and background knowledge. This essay attends to examine these two types of perspectives.
In the first step, it seems that attending the professors and experts can help asset the student’s presentation from personal attitudes which can exert a significant impact on students. In the way of explanation, experts and teachers claim that communication skills one of the primary critical elements for the student that can be considered by a student. However, this issue can be achieved by practice more in front of the mirror. Besides, there is an essential factor that never has ignored how the information transfer to the audience. Particularly, in a group of students, the brochure is a vital way to affect more on audiences. Nonetheless, by arguing between student and professor can be asserted that what sort of skills are crucial for the student. Consequently, a union of individuals is valuable to help understand the shortage of presentations in the university which is needed to develop more by the student.
From an academic point of view, the individuals who have selected as a lecturer should have extensive background knowledge in front of audiences. The professor should consider this issue at the end of the presentation. To illustrate, a group of professors and supervisors should attend the defense season of the student in the master or Ph.D. program. They adopt a heavy burden in the knowledgable context for evaluation students. Although, the student should be ready for this situation, which motivates them to study more when facing experts in this session. Primarily, it is a trend between girl students at the university. For instance, a few students in Iran have a little stress in the presentation time. Moreover, they have faced the majority of problems like missing information during the presentation. To sum up, participating in teacher and experts can help to asset the student from scientific vision.
Additionally, one of the ways which are helped the student to correct and evaluate themselves is recording the voice and video during their speech. Besides, the repetition of playing the video or sound is very easier than attending individuals to asset the student. On fact behind this act is that self-correction can count on the path of developing and learning the speech and presentation. But, it has more lack of openion of the expert. Moreover, participating in the community of individuals for evaluation goals can play a vital role in developing personal and knowledge skills.
In conclusion, from my point of view, it is necessary to discuss with the student, teacher, and professor to evaluate the presentation in two platforms discussed in the essay, and it can help to make progress the vital skills in the crucial frame.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important to keep your old friend than it is to make new friends Use specific reason and examples to support your answer 70
- Students in a university club want to help others but they can only choose one project a year which one of the following is the best 1 Help those students in a nearby primary school with reading and mathematics 2 Help people who cannot afford to build or 73
- In many cases the people who are released from jail commit crimes again What are the causes of this Can you offer any solutions 80
- Today many people continue to do a part time job after being retired sometimes in the same place and sometimes for another organisation Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 73
- Some people believe that certain old buildings are worth preserving more than other buildings What type of old buildings are worth preserving Do the advantages of preserving these buildings outweigh the disadvantages 85
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 104, Rule ID: NEEDS_FIXED[1]
Message: "needed evaluated" is only accepted in certain dialects. For something more widely acceptable, try 'evaluating' or 'to be evaluated'.
Suggestion: evaluating; to be evaluated
...sentation in the class, which is needed evaluated by someone expert or be a professor at ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 609, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...tudents, the brochure is a vital way to affect more on audiences. Nonetheless, by arguing b...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, consequently, first, however, if, moreover, nonetheless, so, for instance, in conclusion, sort of, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 80.0 52.1666666667 153% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.0752688172 235% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2622.0 1977.66487455 133% => OK
No of words: 506.0 407.700716846 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18181818182 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.7428307748 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08655921489 2.67179642975 116% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.450592885375 0.524837075471 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 806.4 618.680645161 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 9.0 3.08781362007 291% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.9875983979 48.9658058833 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.88 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.24 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88 5.45110844103 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121106620764 0.236089414692 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0378397794249 0.076458572812 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0356159614064 0.0737576698707 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0871716950987 0.150856017488 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0315081828641 0.0645574589148 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 11.7677419355 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 86.8835125448 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 10.002688172 155% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 104, Rule ID: NEEDS_FIXED[1]
Message: "needed evaluated" is only accepted in certain dialects. For something more widely acceptable, try 'evaluating' or 'to be evaluated'.
Suggestion: evaluating; to be evaluated
...sentation in the class, which is needed evaluated by someone expert or be a professor at ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 609, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...tudents, the brochure is a vital way to affect more on audiences. Nonetheless, by arguing b...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, consequently, first, however, if, moreover, nonetheless, so, for instance, in conclusion, sort of, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 80.0 52.1666666667 153% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.0752688172 235% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2622.0 1977.66487455 133% => OK
No of words: 506.0 407.700716846 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18181818182 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.7428307748 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08655921489 2.67179642975 116% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.450592885375 0.524837075471 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 806.4 618.680645161 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 9.0 3.08781362007 291% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.9875983979 48.9658058833 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.88 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.24 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88 5.45110844103 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121106620764 0.236089414692 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0378397794249 0.076458572812 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0356159614064 0.0737576698707 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0871716950987 0.150856017488 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0315081828641 0.0645574589148 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 11.7677419355 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 86.8835125448 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 10.002688172 155% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.