Human beings have been receiving benefits from automobiles. The development of cars enables us to travel distant places ,transport people and goods and also facilitated the social and cultural exchange. However, automobiles have brought many disadvantages to our lives as well. The number of casualties from car accidents have been increased as well as animals killed on the road by cars. I agree with the opinion that the invention of cars have degraded the quality of peoples life. Automobiles are dangerous and often cause severe damage to people's body and lives. Also, the invention of cars led to the destruction of environments.
To begin with, automobiles can be detrimental in the case of car accidents. Automobiles are useful and help people quickly move to distant places, but the swiftness could also threaten many people's lives. People sometimes drive carelessly or commit drunk driving without acknowledging the risk and consequences it causes. Car accidents cause irreversible damage to the driver. For example, our uncle because of a single misjudgement on the road had his legs paralyzed due to the impact of a car crash. Furthermore, car accidents can lead to mental depression and PTSD, degrading the mental health of drivers. Moreover, car accidents can be detrimental to people who are not driving. Therefor, automobiles have been threatening our lives.
Secondly, automobiles cause irreversible impact to the environment, which will eventually lead to our own destruction. For example, car produces toxic gases such as carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide. These harmful gases and the fine dust produced from automobiles degrades the quality of air and negatively impacts people's health by causing cancer and tuberculosis. Because of the materials that automobiles radiates, people's lives are seriously threatened. Moreover, the development of automobiles have led to the destruction of natural habitats. The construction of roads for cars have destructed forests and homes of wild animals. Acceleration of global warming caused by the carbon dioxide released from automobiles is threatening human existence as the temperature increases and ozone layers are destroyed, it will eventually damage human lives. Therefore, prevalence of automobile use have destroyed out quality of life.
In conclusion, automobiles could seriously destroy our quality of life. People are endangered from car accidents, and the environmental impact automobile causes affects people's health and the natural inhabitats. Furthermore it will lead to our destruction.
- Should the students do part-time job? 60
- In the future, students may have the choice of studying at home by using technology such as computers or television or of studying at traditional schools. Which would you prefer? Use reasons and specific details to explain your choice. 92
- Spending time with intelligent friends is better than the humorous persons? agree or disagree 82
- Should the students do part-time job? 66
- When people succeed in life it is because of hard work Being lucky has nothing to do with success in life Do you agree or disagree with the quotation above Use specific reasons and examples to explain your position 91
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 120, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...cars enables us to travel distant places ,transport people and goods and also faci...
^^
Line 1, column 544, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'people'.
Suggestion: people
...gerous and often cause severe damage to peoples body and lives. Also, the invention of ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 213, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...ples health and the natural inhabitats. Furthermore it will lead to our destruction.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 43.0788530466 35% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2181.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 389.0 407.700716846 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.60668380463 4.8611393121 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44106776838 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07197835884 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.503856041131 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 699.3 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.0516621724 48.9658058833 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.8846153846 100.406767564 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.9615384615 20.6045352989 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.69230769231 5.45110844103 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 11.8709677419 17% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 22.0 3.85842293907 570% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243551139894 0.236089414692 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0833274483597 0.076458572812 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116325791729 0.0737576698707 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188209062975 0.150856017488 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0868849030864 0.0645574589148 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.34 58.1214874552 69% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.67 10.9000537634 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 86.8835125448 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.