Always telling truth is the mode to keep relationship well
From the time immemorial of human civilization, telling truth is not only a factor but also an influential aspect to foster growing civilization as well as relationship to human society. Although some may ponder that in case of sovereignty and business purposes, telling truth has a positive effect, eventually in the long run, it is proved as baseless. Therefore, I do believe that telling truth is the mainstay to develop any kind relationship.
Telling truth can sustain a relationship in a protective casing without which relationship is a mirage. What I mean by this is that in a relationship whatever it may be business, marital only healthy protection paves the way to keep it firm. To illustrate more, I will share my experience. When I was in class three, I always told a lie and my mother did not expunge me. As a result one day I stole 4kg mangoes then sold it in the market by which I bought a remote of television. By disclosing this view, my father did not scold me rather he inspired me. Eventually when I became a thief, I just complained to police that my mother is liable of being my thief. Basically I believed my parental relationship were an obscure illustration and . In case of business trust and belief are spoiled if you tell lie,
Furthermore, without telling truth a person loses its self-reliant quality as well as esteem. For instance, when you are an established teacher in a society, but after few years all discern that you are not truthful in controlling business or tuition sectors, local people will throw you in the trash. At that moment you have nothing to do to regain previous esteem. Each and every places, you have to tolerate criticize and despise you. For instance, my neighbor is a business man. More often than not , we believe him and took necessaries from his shop. Suddenly TIB authority unearthed that his commodity are false.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-19 | nha1806 | view | |
| 2023-09-10 | tedyang777 | view | |
| 2023-09-10 | tedyang777 | view | |
| 2023-09-10 | tedyang777 | view | |
| 2023-07-13 | M. MEHRABI KERMANI | 70 | view |
- Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage. 3
- People at now are more interested in politics rather than past days 73
- Unexamined Conservatism is far more dangerous than reckless change 76
- write based on reading and lecture 3
- television shows violence scene which is liable to disperse daciots in students 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 372, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...a lie and my mother did not expunge me. As a result one day I stole 4kg mangoes th...
^^
Line 5, column 740, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ionship were an obscure illustration and . In case of business trust and belief ar...
^^
Line 9, column 503, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...r is a business man. More often than not , we believe him and took necessaries fro...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, may, so, then, therefore, well, for instance, i mean, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 52.1666666667 63% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1561.0 1977.66487455 79% => OK
No of words: 326.0 407.700716846 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78834355828 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88132177473 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59509202454 0.524837075471 113% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 618.680645161 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.4144128215 48.9658058833 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.7222222222 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1111111111 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.83333333333 5.45110844103 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.53405017921 66% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26553914661 0.236089414692 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0702918496671 0.076458572812 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0898395065465 0.0737576698707 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176793690708 0.150856017488 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0835339022884 0.0645574589148 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 11.7677419355 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 10.9000537634 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 86.8835125448 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.