write based on reading and lecture
The article states that the progressive decimation and its effect of extinction of the Steller's sea cow was due to the overhunting of human being and it upholds three reasons as support. However, the professor explains that the reasons ascribed upon extinction are not exact, rather they are meaningless and he refutes all three of the reasons with proper logic.
First, the reading claims that sea cow was annihilated by dint of the overhunting by the native Siberian people as they were the predominant people in the 17th century at that time. Moreover according to this theory, as there were no other species like that rife so there were significant chances of extinction by them. Here it is also referable that harsh environment didn't suppress sea cow as they tolerated and easily were habituated to it. Turning to the other side of the logic, the professor refutes by saying that obviously such full extinction is only possible by the huge number of people. What he means by this is that at that time density of Siberian people was very lower and it is well-substantiated. Besides, the height of sea cow is 9 meter and weighs 10 ton. As a result, it is quite onerous that so easily small population of Siberia engrossed it.
Second, the article posits that disruption of the organized ecosystem was the prime source of extinction since sea cow lived on kelp which was totally degraded by the harsh environment. Therefore, it can be said, the main source of food, kelp was decimated by imbalance of ecology which caused their ruins. On the other hand, the lecture says that by far it is well known that if kelp was decimated, so obviously others plants were also annihilated. In consideration of it, whale's main food was also destroyed but it was present then. Actually it provides evidence that ecosystem disruption is an illogical way to make it a fake conclusion.
Third, the reading says that at the 1741 suddenly European trade was extensive and those people were very fond of hunting. Which is why they might hunt sea cow myriad that caused this disruption. In this logic, the professor is very obstinate to accord in it. Eventually he says that sea cow's progressive decrement was result of the previous decade of 1700. That's why it is a hard nut to crack to say wittingly that European people are liable to do this. Rather he says that in the meantime of 1741 the density of sea cow was very negligible. So European trader's hunting might not be an ideal and prime reason to their extinction.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: “It is more important for students to study art and literature than it is to study math and science.” Provide reasons and examples to support your opinion. 73
- In a controlled laboratory study of liquid hand soaps, a concentrated solution of extra strength UltraClean hand soap produced a 40 percent greater reduction in harmful bacteria than did the liquid hand soaps currently used in our hospitals. During our re 50
- write based on reading and lecture 3
- judging teacher as aTV 3
- While giving a feedback positive comments should be given first or negative comments 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 183, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...eople in the 17th century at that time. Moreover according to this theory, as there were...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 370, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...s also referable that harsh environment didnt suppress sea cow as they tolerated and ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 751, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'meter' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'meters'.
Suggestion: meters
...ed. Besides, the height of sea cow is 9 meter and weighs 10 ton. As a result, it is q...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 289, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'cows'' or 'cow's'?
Suggestion: cows'; cow's
...cord in it. Eventually he says that sea cows progressive decrement was result of the...
^^^^
Line 7, column 359, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
... result of the previous decade of 1700. Thats why it is a hard nut to crack to say wi...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 456, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Rather,
... European people are liable to do this. Rather he says that in the meantime of 1741 th...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, besides, but, first, however, if, moreover, second, so, then, therefore, third, well, as to, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 35.0 10.4613686534 335% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 22.0 12.0772626932 182% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 22.412803532 228% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 30.3222958057 178% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 5.01324503311 339% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2076.0 1373.03311258 151% => OK
No of words: 436.0 270.72406181 161% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76146788991 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56953094068 4.04702891845 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66438350903 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 145.348785872 147% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.488532110092 0.540411800872 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 648.0 419.366225166 155% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 13.0662251656 161% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.1230977818 49.2860985944 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.8571428571 110.228320801 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7619047619 21.698381199 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.61904761905 7.06452816374 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 4.45695364238 247% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.029915793612 0.272083759551 11% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00903818003722 0.0996497079465 9% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0221968395219 0.0662205650399 34% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0171970889357 0.162205337803 11% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00995184457035 0.0443174109184 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 12.2367328918 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 63.6247240618 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.