Without a shadow of a doubt, governments play a pivotal role in societies’ mental and physical health. An unanswered question in this area is whether governments are sufficiently promoting public awareness about the significance of healthy diets. Although some arguments people are careful about their meal and healthcare, I believe otherwise, maintaining that most people, especially juveniles are oblivious about their eating. In the following paragraphs, I will elaborate on my viewpoint through two compelling reasons.
The first exquisite point corroborating my stance on this subject is current laws permit TV commercials to glorify innutritious eating and junk foods. Given hectic lifestyles, most people do not have adequate time to cook their meals themselves, so fast foods have become broadly popular, especially among juveniles. On the other hand, TV advertisements and social media adversely affect people and encourage them to consume food like soft drinking, potato chips, and candy bars, to name but a few. Governments allow these companies not only to sell their products but also to advertise whenever they want. Consequently, people take for granted that these foods are not too healthy, eliminating them from their food habits.
Another reason to be mentioned is that many people are suffering from serious diseases resulting from unhealthy diets. Obesity is common among adolescents because their diets consist of high-calorie and low nutritious foods, and their parents do not discourage children from eating junk food. Schools do not employ effective ways to inform students about the long-term effects of poor nutrition, nor do they ban selling calorie-dense products therein. Moreover, most elderly people have symptoms of high pressure and diabetes. If TV programs allocate considerable time for health-related issues, treatment and drug supply expenditures will decrease substantially. For example, a survey conducted in my country revealed that one-fourth of individuals over the age of 50 probably would experience heart illness, and the government would expense about twenty million dollars for curing them.
Reflecting upon the grounds mentioned above, one soon realizes the government policies have weaknesses for promoting healthy and high nutrition eating.
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, moreover, so, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1954.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 342.0 407.700716846 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.7134502924 4.8611393121 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94410614966 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.666666666667 0.524837075471 127% => OK
syllable_count: 591.3 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.6162780588 48.9658058833 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.125 100.406767564 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.375 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.45110844103 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196167077957 0.236089414692 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0568643371025 0.076458572812 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0359488981902 0.0737576698707 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115558848883 0.150856017488 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0272361784181 0.0645574589148 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 11.7677419355 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 58.1214874552 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 10.9000537634 145% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.22 8.01818996416 127% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 86.8835125448 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.247311828 156% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, moreover, so, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1954.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 342.0 407.700716846 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.7134502924 4.8611393121 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94410614966 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.666666666667 0.524837075471 127% => OK
syllable_count: 591.3 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.6162780588 48.9658058833 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.125 100.406767564 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.375 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.45110844103 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196167077957 0.236089414692 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0568643371025 0.076458572812 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0359488981902 0.0737576698707 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115558848883 0.150856017488 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0272361784181 0.0645574589148 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 11.7677419355 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 58.1214874552 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 10.9000537634 145% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.22 8.01818996416 127% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 86.8835125448 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.247311828 156% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.