In areas where there are many restaurants, some people prefer to buy their meals in
restaurants very frequently, rather than cooking and eating meals at home. Other people prefer to cook most of their meals at home and only rarely eat in a restaurant. Which one would you choose and why?
It goes without saying that wholesome foods which people eat in meals plays an important role in their health. Some people prefer to go resturants and buy their meals, while many people hold another opinion, stating that it is better to cook most of their meals at home and prefer to go restaurant rarely. I, personally, concur with the latter group for two main reasons, on which I will elaborate in the following paragraphs.
First of all, cooking the meals at home is more reliable for people than buying meals from restaurants. In fact, the emergence of scared diseases and different type of cancer resulted from unhealthy foods, as well as increase in the number of people suffering from heart problems cause that people allocate more attention to their meal choices. As a result, people who cook their meals at home know exactly which material they are using and could control the amount of oil and salt in their foods, unlike the restaurants which use much more oil and salt to create delicious taste, increasing their customers. For example, my brother who was a student in another city, almost went out for lunch and dinner because he did not like cooking, after a while he suffered high blood pressure because of high amount salt. Now, it makes many problems for him in daily activities and always should measure and control his blood pressure. Therefore, cooking reliable and healthy food at home positively affects the people health.
Secondly, cooking at home helps people to save more money than when they buy meals from restaurants. In other words, preparing raw material for cooking such as rice, oil, meat, and so on needs less money than buying prepared foods, because the resaurants usually have alot of labor, any of which should be paied salary monthly . Therefore, it is rational that the price of their meals be more than their real value. Consequently, people prefer to pay less money and cook their favorite foods. For example, when I was student, I alloted a part of my income for buying my meals from restaurant because I did not have enough time to spent cooking. After a mouth, I accounted my spent money and I realized that if I buyed raw material and cooked by myself, I would saved a lot of money, helping me do other activities such as buying my favorite books. As a result, cooking at home help people to reduce their expenses alocated to daily meals.
To conclude, for above reasons, cooking the meals at home is more beneficial than buying them from resaurants. Not only is it more reliable in terms of health and wholesomeness, preventing from suffering various diseases, but also it helps people save more money rather than spending their money buying foods which are undervalue.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation. 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave. 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation. 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 68
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation. 68
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 299, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[3]
Message: The adverb 'rarely' is usually not used at the end of a sentence.
...als at home and prefer to go restaurant rarely. I, personally, concur with the latter ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 327, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... of which should be paied salary monthly . Therefore, it is rational that the pric...
^^
Line 5, column 762, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'save'
Suggestion: save
... material and cooked by myself, I would saved a lot of money, helping me do other act...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 940, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...their expenses alocated to daily meals. To conclude, for above reasons, cooking ...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 320, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'undervalued'.
Suggestion: undervalued
...ding their money buying foods which are undervalue.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in fact, such as, as a result, as well as, first of all, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2259.0 1977.66487455 114% => OK
No of words: 467.0 407.700716846 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83725910064 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64867537961 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42693188127 2.67179642975 91% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.496788008565 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 682.2 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.5339665899 48.9658058833 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.5 100.406767564 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9444444444 20.6045352989 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.22222222222 5.45110844103 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.440535305047 0.236089414692 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.171474333651 0.076458572812 224% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124982992276 0.0737576698707 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.303328184621 0.150856017488 201% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0569433469351 0.0645574589148 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 58.1214874552 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.