The best way for a government to solve the air pollution is raising gas prices. Do you agree or disagree?
People often possess different perspectives on whether the best way for a government to solve the air pollution is raising gas prices. While some think that raising gas price is the best way, others think otherwise. As for as I am concerned, I totally believe that improving public transportation system is a better way. Based on my observations, I tend to agree with the later.
First of all, the government cares about its reputation, and improving public transportation system can boost its reputation. For example, in 2008, the government was suffered from the loss of its poll because of the world economy crisis and high unemployment rate resulted from the crisis. Therefore, the government started to put budget in various kinds of public services, and expand the covered area of metro was included. Surprisingly, the government’s poll was not only recovered, but also, the party won the next year election and kept its place in the office
Secondly, the government places emphasis on its citizens, and raising gas prices can do harm to its citizen. For instance, I live in a poor family, and my father has to drive to work every day, if the government raise gas prices, my father would have to spend more money on gas, and this would strongly damage the life quality of my family. On the other hand, if the government choose to improve public transportation system, not only my father can sell the car and take bus or metro to work, but also, I can take public transportation to school, which will largely reduce the amount of money our family spends on travel. Apparently, raising gas price is not the best way.
In conclusion, with all this taken into account, I strongly believe the government should improve public transportation system rather than raise gas prices. After all, improving public transportation system will help the government boost its reputation, and do no harm to its citizens.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-19 | KevinLiu0708 | 70 | view |
- The best way for a government to solve the air pollution is raising gas prices Do you agree or disagree 70
- A university wants to improve the quality of life for students who reside in a dormitory on campus Which ONE of the following things do you think the university should spend money on for this purpose and why 1 Providing a room for quiet study 2 Building a 60
- You should make sure that other people know about your strengths and accomplishments in order to be successful in the future 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 567, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lection and kept its place in the office Secondly, the government places emphasis...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, first, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, after all, as for, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 43.0788530466 56% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 52.1666666667 69% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.0752688172 272% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1599.0 1977.66487455 81% => OK
No of words: 322.0 407.700716846 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96583850932 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84105822195 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 212.727598566 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527950310559 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 618.680645161 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 8.0 1.86738351254 428% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.811895215 48.9658058833 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.0 100.406767564 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7692307692 20.6045352989 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.3076923077 5.45110844103 244% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31617938809 0.236089414692 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137041815166 0.076458572812 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.130267709238 0.0737576698707 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.2086820866 0.150856017488 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.142030484105 0.0645574589148 220% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 86.8835125448 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.