Both the reading and the lecture discuss whether the birds population in the Us decrease or not. The former argues that due to three specific cause the birds population will decrease or even decline where the latter contradicts all the three points made by the reading.
First of all, the author contends that due to the increase in human population more birds habittable lands are given to the home and office or indrastrial building as a consequence the bird habittable zones are destroying as well as their population. In contrast, the lecturer argues that, this point is taking a unnessesary argumnt and in the urban are although some birds population srinks a little other grown much larger in the population.
Secondly, The reading asserts that, due to the agriculture increase there need more land and thus it couses more destruction to the birds habitants that leads in further decreases in the bird population. However, the proffesor rebuts that, in recent times the amount of land use for the agriculture in US has been reduced and with ihte introduction of new products that need less land to have high production the amount of land will futher reduce. He also adds that with in the development in the genitic crops more production is now possible in less unit of land and there is no need to distruction of the birds habitants.
Finally, the text claims that, in order to increase the amount in croups the farmer use chemically poisinious pesticides and the birds population are in danger as it may have a direct concequence to their food chain as well as can indirectlly hamper their reproduuction ability. On the other hand, the listening counters that, in practice this claims is incorrectly projected to the history. He fr=urther agrues that, due new technological development there are now less toxoic pesticides and also scientists invent some mutants of crops that can genitically have pest resistance in them so that there are no need to use pesticides extarnally. So there are now greater resources si that there need no use of pesticides and will not hamper the birds population.
- a 11
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate 50
- The cane toad is a large (1.8 kg) amphibian species native to Central and South America. It was deliberately introduced to Australia in 1935 with the expectation that it would protect farmers' crops by eating harmful insects. Unfortunately, the toad 80
- Populations of the yellow cedar, a species of tree that is common in northwestern North America, have been steadily declining for more than a century now, since about 1880. Scientists have advanced several hypotheses to explain this decline.One hypothesis 70
- bird 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 54, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'birds'' or 'bird's'?
Suggestion: birds'; bird's
...ing and the lecture discuss whether the birds population in the Us decrease or not. T...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 153, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'birds'' or 'bird's'?
Suggestion: birds'; bird's
...es that due to three specific cause the birds population will decrease or even declin...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 312, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...turer argues that, this point is taking a unnessesary argumnt and in the urban ar...
^
Line 3, column 369, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'birds'' or 'bird's'?
Suggestion: birds'; bird's
...umnt and in the urban are although some birds population srinks a little other grown ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 270, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...buts that, in recent times the amount of land use for the agriculture in US has b...
^^
Line 7, column 130, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'birds'' or 'bird's'?
Suggestion: birds'; bird's
...hemically poisinious pesticides and the birds population are in danger as it may have...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 670, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'resources'' or 'resource's'?
Suggestion: resources'; resource's
...es extarnally. So there are now greater resources si that there need no use of pesticides...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 744, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'birds'' or 'bird's'?
Suggestion: birds'; bird's
...e of pesticides and will not hamper the birds population.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, thus, well, in contrast, as well as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.0752688172 248% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1757.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 354.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96327683616 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76644260713 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 212.727598566 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.477401129944 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 545.4 618.680645161 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.6003584229 53% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 20.1344086022 159% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.6191771244 48.9658058833 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 159.727272727 100.406767564 159% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.1818181818 20.6045352989 156% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.2727272727 5.45110844103 225% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 11.8709677419 25% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306290934913 0.236089414692 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145905077652 0.076458572812 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101841547805 0.0737576698707 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212559001945 0.150856017488 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0604338261697 0.0645574589148 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 11.7677419355 153% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.46 58.1214874552 82% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.1575268817 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.08 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 86.8835125448 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.0537634409 147% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 61.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.