Children should spend most of their time on playing and studying or helping family do some household chores

Essay topics:

Children should spend most of their time on playing and studying or helping family do some household chores.

It is hard to exaggerate how much children’s early-stage education changes their personalities and dispositions. It is childhood that cultivates children’s various habits. Though people give great regard for the young’s academic performance, frankly, habits helping family with household chores coupled with washing dishes, cleaning the floor, and doing laundry could really modify one’s identity in long run.

For starters, helping family do household chores is beneficial for children to cultivate a flair for independence. Household chores are inextricable and inevitable for an individual. To specific it more clearly, children will eventually grow up and possess their own family. All sorts of domestic chores attach importance in playing a role in family. It is indispensable for people especially women to do that kind of work. Therefore, starting practice at a comparatively younger age is reasonable. And for children, whom are at the state of shaping themselves, are required be assiduous not only in academically studying, but more in resolving problems from daily life. It leads to the conclusion that children become more independent and more mature at acting as family member. Thus, it is significant to help the family with basic work.

Secondly, by figuring out the household chores can children develop a sense of responsibility. As a recently study shows, children who started participating in family activities now have a stronger sense of responsibility. Frankly, resulting from the modern society and better living standard, the phenomenon that children are resting on parents to a greater extent and are less responsible for family. Nevertheless, parents also become less aware of fostering children’s good habits. Take my younger brother for an instance, he seldomly assist my family with assorted work, and it is I who always replace him in helping with chores. With time passing by, I become more willing and active in exertion of family chores. To the contrast, my brother continues his sedentary and cozy life, and even yell at me and my parents ever since we call him. Obviously, the negative influence will be enhanced if children keep staying indifferent with family chores. The loss of that sort of responsibility is critical and should be reestablish when children are at a younger age.

All in all, I firmly hold the point that children should spend more time on assisting the family by doing chores.

Votes
Average: 8.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-10-07 thoyyyy 86 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user thoyyyy :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 30, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
It is hard to exaggerate how much children’s early-stage education change...
^^^^
Line 6, column 99, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('recently') instead an adjective, or a noun ('study') instead of another adjective.
...n develop a sense of responsibility. As a recently study shows, children who started participati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1020, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'reestablished'?
Suggestion: reestablished
...esponsibility is critical and should be reestablish when children are at a younger age. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, frankly, if, nevertheless, really, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, kind of, sort of

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2071.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 386.0 407.700716846 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36528497409 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43248042346 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0174452725 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567357512953 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 649.8 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.9592590006 48.9658058833 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.1363636364 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5454545455 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.59090909091 5.45110844103 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.326463596143 0.236089414692 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0903743124755 0.076458572812 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0603062410692 0.0737576698707 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211070733274 0.150856017488 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0322029169287 0.0645574589148 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 11.7677419355 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.57 10.9000537634 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 86.8835125448 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.