The companies, should pay money for their employees to get their university degrees.
It is no secret that, by the advent of technology, the role of companies has been elevated. The revenue of big companies has a pivotal role in GDP of one country. In this regard, there is an inevitable question causing heated debate among the proprietors which is how can a compony improve its yield through its employee. Therefore a plethora of people possess the conviction that a company should financially support its employees so that they can get a university degree. From my vantage point, this conviction is true; as a matter of fact, I agree with such people. In what follows my self-evident rationales will cogently substantiate this perspective.
One of the primary reasons striking my mind is that the company’s worker will be more loyal and industrious after this kind of payment. A worker will feel that a company valued her by giving this opportunity therefore she will plan to recompense for their generous offer by working from her heart. As a case in point, my friend Sara got the same opportunity. She has worked much harder than before as she thought that her boss gave her this chance since he saw professional competence on her. Hence, it would be her responsibility to do well so as not to let his boss down.
Another equally important reason is that although it would be difficult for the company to cover the high cost of employees’ education, in long-term it would pave the way for the future opportunities to generate profits. The noteworthy statistics, revealed by a recent social research conducted in 100 well-known companies, show that approximately 78% of companies who fund their employees’education will render their companies more lucrative. The very epitome of them is Apple company which offers tuition reimbursement up to $50,000 for related job course. On this subject, this company has a prominent motto wich says ‘’The more educated worker a company has, the more profit it gains.''
The last but not the least reason is despite the fact that meeting the costs of worker’s education seems uneconomical, at the first glance, for the company’s owner it will have some advantageous aspects which may change their viewpoints. In this case, for a worker who thinks that continuing education is a determinant of success may become tough remaining in the job in which company will not provide this opportunity for him. On the other side of the coin if a company loses the worker it should pay high amounts of money not only for hiring another employee but also for preparing him for doing the job appropriately.
To sum up, taking all the aforementioned into account, it can be concluded that In some cases, it will be a fruitful decision for a company to pay for an employee’s education; actually, there are some other reasons and examples, supporting the claim which are not mentioned above. All in all, it is suggested that a survey be conducted to find out more information about this issue.
- Greek weapon called a '' burning mirror 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The best way to improve the quality of education in a country is to increase teachers’ salaries. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Movies and televisions should always show audience that good people are rewarded and bad people are punished 40
- The companies should pay money for their employees to get their university degrees 95
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement？ Being creative, rather than planning carefully, helps people come up with the best solution to a problem. 86
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 323, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...improve its yield through its employee. Therefore a plethora of people possess the convic...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 388, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... out more information about this issue.
^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['actually', 'also', 'but', 'first', 'hence', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'therefore', 'well', 'kind of', 'as a matter of fact', 'in some cases', 'to sum up']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.22591943958 0.229887763892 98% => OK
Verbs: 0.145359019264 0.158761421928 92% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0718038528897 0.0866891130778 83% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0402802101576 0.046263068375 87% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0647985989492 0.0685040099705 95% => OK
Prepositions: 0.134851138354 0.118717715034 114% => OK
Participles: 0.0402802101576 0.0351676179071 115% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.07687402335 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Infinitives: 0.015761821366 0.0309702414327 51% => OK
Particles: 0.00525394045534 0.00188951952338 278% => OK
Determiners: 0.119089316988 0.0887237588012 134% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.031523642732 0.0209618222197 150% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.015761821366 0.0139019557991 113% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2976.0 2387.08602151 125% => OK
No of words: 498.0 408.028673835 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.97590361446 5.86048508987 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72397222731 4.48200974243 105% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.341365461847 0.338922669872 101% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.25702811245 0.251872472559 102% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.174698795181 0.174417080927 100% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.138554216867 0.112833075102 123% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07687402335 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 274.0 212.727598566 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550200803213 0.524397521467 105% => OK
Word variations: 67.6156984319 59.2087087015 114% => OK
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6684587814 97% => OK
Sentence length: 24.9 20.5533526081 121% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.646086656 48.84282405 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.8 120.699889404 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9 20.5533526081 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.7 0.644075263715 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.5376344086 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.54480286738 36% => OK
Readability: 50.602811245 45.7405998639 111% => OK
Elegance: 1.6013986014 1.45489161554 110% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271169677217 0.300154397459 90% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.135512899645 0.103427244359 131% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.08116190712 0.0752933317313 108% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.52404511057 0.497263757937 105% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.150939191596 0.151897553556 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.090382201373 0.114077575197 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0714580841919 0.0781384742642 91% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.339835006413 0.336927656856 101% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.104413983475 0.067059652881 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163246877277 0.210909579961 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0646216191509 0.0618886996521 104% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8870967742 109% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.86379928315 52% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.91756272401 102% => OK
Positive topic words: 11.0 8.42114695341 131% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 2.4623655914 81% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 2.75985663082 145% => OK
Total topic words: 17.0 13.6433691756 125% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.