Consider a situation where you are asked by your supervisor to work with one of your co-workers on a project. This co-worker has opinions that are very different than yours and they feel very strongly about these opinions. Do you think this is a good idea? Use reasons and examples to support your answer
This scenario of having to work with colleagues with very diffferent opinions has been experienced by almost all working professionals around the world.This scenario might be for good, and there is no reason to fret over it, as companies have robust decision making structures that depend on facts and data only, and also this setup can lead to better ideas and fresh ways of thinking.
The first reason this is a good idea and it might work is that in any organisation, decision making, ideally, should not be made on opinions, and should be based on concrete facts, and thus difference in opinion between employees should not matter. Organisations should look at data and trends before making a decision, instead of relying on their employees opinions. Let us consider an example of a new product launch in a company. The product is conceptualized and launched with a huge amount of market research data and customer survey trends. Companies do not launch product based on opinions, as they know this can fall flat on its face. Therefore, it is clear that in a good decision making process, the difference in opinion beteen employees should not matter.
Secondly, working with people with different perspectives and opinions can be a great source of learning for oneself. There is a famous saying that goes as follows – “We don’t see the world as it is, we see the the world as we are.” We often tend to see the world through the lens of our opinions, which often makes many situations murky, and we may fail to see the larger picture. Working ith people with diffferent opinions, we have one more perspective to look at the issue from, which can lead to new ideas and avenues.As an example, consider a soccer coach, having an assistant coach having a very different football philosophy and belonging to different school of thought. This combination can bring together a lot more to the table, as they can read different opponents better, and the coaches could have lot of learnings of each other.
Thus, the decision of the supervisor to make people of different opinions to work together is a good one. This is a common scenario in the professional world, and it is good because It does not affect a data and fact based decision making process and secondly, it gives each person fresh vies and perspectiv es on the problem, leading to better learning.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-17 | PATRICK WINSTON A | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-23 | alqaryan | 70 | view |
- The primary goal of technological advancement should be to increase people’s efficiency so that they have more leisure time. 58
- The following appeared in the memo from the director of a large group of hospitals.“In a controlled loboratory study of liquid hand soaps, a concentrated solution of extra strength UltraClean hand soap produced a 40 percent greater reduction in harmful 50
- Consider a situation where you are asked by your supervisor to work with one of your co-workers on a project. This co-worker has opinions that are very different than yours and they feel very strongly about these opinions. Do you think this is a good idea 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 153, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
... working professionals around the world.This scenario might be for good, and there i...
^^^^
Line 9, column 218, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...n't see the world as it is, we see the the world as we are.' We often tend to...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 218, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...n't see the world as it is, we see the the world as we are.' We often tend to...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 539, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: As
...which can lead to new ideas and avenues.As an example, consider a soccer coach, ha...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1981.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 407.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86732186732 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49157444576 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66530299353 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 212.727598566 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.496314496314 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 594.0 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.86738351254 375% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.1344086022 154% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 94.749373544 48.9658058833 194% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.384615385 100.406767564 152% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.3076923077 20.6045352989 152% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.45110844103 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188052586852 0.236089414692 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0740956166877 0.076458572812 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0457847575047 0.0737576698707 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120879026438 0.150856017488 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.011342009279 0.0645574589148 18% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 11.7677419355 146% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.1575268817 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.56 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 27.0 10.002688172 270% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.0537634409 143% => OK
text_standard: 27.0 10.247311828 263% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.