dams
The reading and the lecture both are about dams. The author of the reading believes that dams are appropriate creation source of electricity nowadays, and he present three reasons to prove his assertion. This argument is challenged by the lecture. He is of the opinion that none of these claims is correct.
First, the author alleges that the dams don’t have any impact on the environment, even, have positive effect on it. it is mentioned that, lakes created behind the dams provide a good habitat for fish and create an entertainment area for local people. But the lecturer argues that dams form many remarkable problems during and after the construction. He says when a dam is build, the direction of water should be changed to allow workers to work. So it cause migration fish die. Furthermore, after the construction, velocity of water is decreased so that fish can not lay their eggs.
Secondly, the writer contends that the power produced by dams is almost the same amount as the coal plants generate while producing electricity in this way don’t release global gas into the air. The lecturer, however, rebuts this by asserting that, the lands surrounding dams permanently are flooded so that the plants within plain are destroyed. As a result, the rotten plants release the netrotin that is one of the global warming gas.
Finally, it is stated in the article that, dams don’t create financial problem for the community. The article notes, incomes is made by existence of dams per year is more than operating cost. So it also, has benefits for the local citizen. The lecturer, on the other hand, posits this by mentioning that building a dam isn’t possible without government aid. In addition, flood plain that was the land, local people live there should be relocated. Therefor, these expenses are taken as a tax from local people, so it is as burden on local shoulder.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-21 | Rustin_Panda | 86 | view |
| 2021-02-16 | Llsnxbdjzbbab263646 | 59 | view |
| 2021-02-16 | Llsnxbdjzbbab263646 | 76 | view |
| 2019-01-15 | sara.87 | 70 | view |
- tv advertising 60
- universities should give credit to sports and social programs as well as science 76
- Some people prefer to live in a small town. Others prefer to live in a big city. Which place would you prefer to live in? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. 70
- It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends 60
- Some people prefer to live in a small town. Others prefer to live in a big city. Which place would you prefer to live in? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 290, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eople. But the lecturer argues that dams form many remarkable problems during and...
^^
Line 3, column 459, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'causes'?
Suggestion: causes
...changed to allow workers to work. So it cause migration fish die. Furthermore, after ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, however, second, secondly, so, while, in addition, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 52.1666666667 61% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1592.0 1977.66487455 80% => OK
No of words: 320.0 407.700716846 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.975 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62094925552 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 212.727598566 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.58125 0.524837075471 111% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 618.680645161 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 10.0 3.08781362007 324% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.6492410468 48.9658058833 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.7894736842 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8421052632 20.6045352989 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.36842105263 5.45110844103 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.346100837012 0.236089414692 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0987308637226 0.076458572812 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0955192745418 0.0737576698707 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203310349373 0.150856017488 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0619278054637 0.0645574589148 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.25 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 86.8835125448 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.