rules
When it comes to the question that whether the rules nowadays are more stringent for young people that in the past, it brings up a controversial debate. Opinions vary from person to person. Many have held the opinion that the rules are easy to follow by young people in today's world whereas others opposed the first opinion and point out that these rules are strict. I, to a huge extent, believe that the rules that addressed youth today are not hard to follow. Among countless reasons which can vindicate my point of view, I will explicate two conspicuous ones through the following essay.
The first reason that immediately comes into my mind is that nowadays youth have more freedom than in the past. For example, in the past, they usually pursued their family's policies or society. Even in so personal matters, young people could see their parents' intervention like in the choosing of a spouse or even choosing a career for themselves. This example can shed more light on the issue I have just indicated.
The second reason makes me hold this opinion is that there are some governmental policies that can prevent youth from any irrational rules either inside the family or society. Nowadays psychologists have concluded that strict rules may make the youth so keen to do adversely concerning the rules. Their studies indicate that more pressure on youth has negative effects on them mentally because with these rules they feel more obligated and since they do not have the freedom they want to restore their freedom anyhow.
To wrap up the argument, based on the aforementioned reasons, I definitely pounder that today's rules are not hard to follow if we compare them with past rules and it is good for young people to follow them since these rules help the society to be more organized.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, second, so, whereas, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1502.0 1977.66487455 76% => OK
No of words: 308.0 407.700716846 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87662337662 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4051473832 2.67179642975 90% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 212.727598566 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542207792208 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 618.680645161 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.0967661507 48.9658058833 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.538461538 100.406767564 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6923076923 20.6045352989 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.69230769231 5.45110844103 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.312430526164 0.236089414692 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117325668789 0.076458572812 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122336341156 0.0737576698707 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21650054733 0.150856017488 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.13249336794 0.0645574589148 205% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 86.8835125448 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.