Do you agree of disagree with the following statements? Grades (marks) encourage students to learn. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
As the competition of applying to prestigious schools becomes more and more intense, students tried harder than ever in order to obtain higher grades. This would make them more competitive among thousands of applicants. Their motivations to learn essentially originate from it. Therefore, I strongly agree that marks encourage students to learn.
Nowadays, ranking systems are pervasive in typical Chinese high schools. They are all designed to keep students informed of their grades among their peers, and thus to motivate them to work harder. If a student ranks below the average of their peers, their teachers and parents will not be satisfied with their performance and will push them to study harder. Thus, the external force also plays an important function for encouraging those students. Plus, student themselves can also feel shamed for their low rankings, so they are likely to try harder to prove themselves, having more energies to learn.
Grades can also motivate students' learning in another way, that is, fulfilling the wish of going to their dreamed schools or getting their desired jobs. Students study to prepare themselves ready for the next stage of their lives, and that is, either receiving a higher education or getting a job. In this scenario, grade is something that students can not neglect. Good schools and companies always look for those who achieved high grades in their previous education experience, proving that they are more capable for the position than others. Hence, if they want to become more competitive, students always want to ensure a nice grade by studying hard. This is originated from the bottom of their heart, the impulse of chasing their dreams, to seek for a better life and a better self. Such impulse is extremely strong and unprecedented.
To sum up, grade can encourage students to learn in two ways: to achieve a good position in the school's ranking system and to chase for their dreams by making themselves more competitive.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-04 | ArashAlirezaei | 70 | view |
| 2023-03-04 | ArashAlirezaei | 70 | view |
| 2023-03-02 | Liu160502 | 90 | view |
| 2023-03-02 | Liu160502 | 78 | view |
| 2022-09-28 | TTTTTTTTC | 70 | view |
- Native to Europe and Asia cheatgrass is an invasive species of grass that is causing problems in North American fields The plant quickly dominates fields that it has invaded and drives out other plants This can cause among other problems severe damage to 81
- The Plain of Jars is an archaeological site in the Southeast Asian country of Laos At the site hundreds of large stone jars ranging in size from one to three meters are scattered across the countryside These numerous large containers are around 2 000 year 3
- An airship is a type of aircraft that flies using a very large balloon filled with a Iighter than air gas Airships were an important means of air transportation before the 1940s but are little used today having been largely replaced by airplanes and helic 90
- Wild tuna a species of large ocean fish have decreased in number because of overfishing Recently attempts have been made to farm tuna by feeding the fish in ocean cages until they become large enough for sale However tuna farming has faced several problem 95
- In modern days parents can learn more from their children than children can learn from their parents 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, if, look, so, therefore, thus, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1662.0 1977.66487455 84% => OK
No of words: 324.0 407.700716846 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12962962963 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57506568223 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 212.727598566 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.549382716049 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 618.680645161 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.2850939953 48.9658058833 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.7647058824 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0588235294 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.11764705882 5.45110844103 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129332803171 0.236089414692 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0563052572655 0.076458572812 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0671881534986 0.0737576698707 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0983013470143 0.150856017488 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0205149721811 0.0645574589148 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 86.8835125448 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.