Nowadays, travelling has not only become an excellent way to get away from the daily life for a leisure and relax, but also an efficient means to broaden one’s horizons. But a controversy that how to choose our destination of our trip has come into our sight. Some people hold the point of view that traveling in their own country will be more conducive to them while others hold opposite ideas that it will be better to have a long journey abroad. As far as I’m concerned, both choices are equally advantageous to us.
On the one hand, traveling abroad can help us grasp a marvelous opportunity to further our understanding of foreign countries to a larger degree. Indeed, only after stepping onto the foreign land in person, can someone get an overall and comprehensive view of the real life of local citizens. And you can immerse yourself in the real culture surroundings that used to be written in books or showed in the screen, which is second-hand information. For instance, before I traveled to India, the image of this country demonstrates that it is poor and keep pace with the modernization of the whole world. The stories and pictures also exhibit that this country is stuffed with discrimination and prejudice of women. However, once involved in the interactions with local people, I could vividly experience the friendly way they entertain guests, and the cuisine there is delicious as well. Women from every walk of life there are sparing no efforts to fighting for their own rights, leaving impressive memory in my brain. Thus, on no account should we contend that we are familiar with an alien country without paying a visit to it on our own.
On the other hand, the significance of traveling in our motherland also should be mentioned. Needless to say, speaking the same language, we can easily have intimate contacts with the local and can push our communication to a deep degree. To illustrate, a visit to Shandong province, situated in the eastern part of China, may be viewed as marvelous chance to appreciate their own unique culture. You can also enjoy different attractions and food there without consideration of behaving improperly. Moreover, the apprecition of the magnificent scenic spots within the nation such as Mountain Tai, make the travelers pay more tribute and respect to their motherland. Thus, a strong sense of pride will be cultivated. On the contrary, without having a knowledge of historical background, it is conceivable that you cannot get a clear picture of the significance of some specific attractions in foreign country, at most time you were just visited there.
From what has been discussed above, we can safely draw a conclusion that traveling in a foreign country is no less important than taking a trip in your own country. Not only shouldn’t we give top priority to any one of them, and we possess the rights to decide which one is more beneficial and suitable for us.
- Many organizations try to draw people s attention to serious problems such as climate change or poverty These organizations often use images photographs and videos to motivate people to take action against those problems Some organizations use sad images 80
- In some countries students do not pay any tuition to attend universities However in other countries students must pay to attend universities and the cost of university tuition can be very high Therefore some people believe that all the nations should use 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Educating young people about healthy food is important and should not be the job of families alone it should also be the responsibility of schools to teach their students about healthy eating 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers should be paid according to how well their students perform. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the statement People often buy products not because they really need them but because other people have them 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, moreover, second, so, thus, well, while, for instance, such as, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 74.0 52.1666666667 142% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2451.0 1977.66487455 124% => OK
No of words: 498.0 407.700716846 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92168674699 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72397222731 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83882981073 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 276.0 212.727598566 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55421686747 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 768.6 618.680645161 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.2644257741 48.9658058833 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.714285714 100.406767564 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7142857143 20.6045352989 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.04761904762 5.45110844103 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237218826846 0.236089414692 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0634593832199 0.076458572812 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0528940103348 0.0737576698707 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14424069564 0.150856017488 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0349967979661 0.0645574589148 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 86.8835125448 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.