Do you agree that it is better to work for business owned by someone else than to work for the business of one's own family.
Business is a catch-all term that refers to any activity to earn money, thereby maintain and improving living standards. In this respect, some people prefer to work for business owned and directed by someone else; however, some others stand at the other extreme, believing that working for the family business is more prominent. Yet to the best of my knowledge, I side with the latter people in favor of family enterprises. The following paragraphs lend credence to this view.
First and foremost, what provokes people to adhere to businesses owned by the family is that it gives more authority at work. It is crystal clear that individuals will benefit from flexible time shifts, opening many opportunities to carry out their responsibilities. It has been acknowledged that family businesses give more freedom to people about how to accomplish their job, leading more creative and innovative approach on the assumption that there have been times that people are more energetic to cope with issues of their job. Furthermore, not only do individuals release from the burden of excessive workload in a day, but they also are able to diffuse responsibilities to the times best fit with them. So, they can surmount the hurdles and problems of their job with more ease. It is worth bearing in mind by reducing the stress-induced factors of jobs such as undue deadlines; individuals will apply more down-to-earth approaches to make a decision and solve a problem. And the other point that would be another advantage of family businesses is that people can enjoy from more work-life balance.
What is more, working for family enterprises, people would be more compassionate about their job. This is because they can implement responsibilities with more sympathy and goodwill; the presence of which will lead to an outstanding, considerable positive outcome. It worth mentioning that assorted first-world, developed countries encourage juvenile, particularly in the suburb regions, to attend family businesses such as farming, fruit picking, fishing, and so forth. It stands to the reason that the aspirations of the youngster from impoverished families, for example, tend to be different from those young people living in metropolitan cities, contributing greatly to be passionate about their father’s job. By learning miscellaneous hands-on experiences, these people turn to be well-rounded, prosperous entrepreneur due to the fact that they will progress their hereditary occupation by using state-of-the-art facilities, such as using mechanical combines instead of hand-plowing.
In the final analysis, I have to reiterate my standpoint that I am in favor of businesses owned by the family. This is because people can enjoy a flexible time, and they would be more benevolent with their hereditary jobs.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Nowadays it is not important for people to have regularly family meals together. 73
- If people want to contribute to the society, which of the following is the best way?1. Riding bicycle or walking on foot2. Recycling the waste3. Buy local organic food 71
- TPO51 3
- Do you agree or disagree? If people have the opportunity get a secure job, they should take it right away rather than wait for a satisfying job. 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 911, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... undue deadlines; individuals will apply more down-to-earth approaches to make a ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, so, well, for example, such as, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 52.1666666667 132% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2378.0 1977.66487455 120% => OK
No of words: 441.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39229024943 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58257569496 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11914632412 2.67179642975 117% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 212.727598566 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537414965986 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 743.4 618.680645161 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.8574802022 48.9658058833 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.111111111 100.406767564 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 20.6045352989 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88888888889 5.45110844103 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174053448533 0.236089414692 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0621127318609 0.076458572812 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0893993394725 0.0737576698707 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130585750457 0.150856017488 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0698496283177 0.0645574589148 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 11.7677419355 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 58.1214874552 67% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 10.9000537634 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.01818996416 116% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 86.8835125448 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.