Do you agree or disagree? The best way to improve the quality of education in a country is to increase the teachers’ salaries.
The question is whether an increase in teachers' salaries can lead a country to optimize the quality of its education system or not. Everyone in consideration to his private view point can maintain a specific direction toward this statement; however, I am inclined to declare that the proposed idea will not be the best decision for improving of this section. I feel this in some ways, which I will explore them in following essay for strengthening my vantage point:
To begin with, nobody could overlook the role of teachers and professors in a society since they are prosperous humans; hence, this strata is deserved of respect; however, one should not forget that nowadays the technology has improved and also it has kept marching forward. Such a technology-driven world, students access to the newest electronic devices and the fast speed of internet. It goes without saying that a wide range of data is available for students; consequently, the young will be able to obtain the most up-dated information through a variety of resources. My opinion may seem a bit of ambitiously but whether we want or not, our teachers could have gained their knowledge by those same mentioned data above which were written in the books. Even more, today’s new discoveries have challenged the old theories and matters; as a result, the overwhelming majority of teachers tries to instruct in the same old route. Nevertheless, an increment in the income cannot be a rational reason for boosting the teachers' performance.
The second reason why I refute with this view lies the fact that if government determines a reasonable number of money for other aspects of education, it will be more effective. For instance, a professional management can spend this budget for providing the newest published books and the most comfort chairs and tables for library, buying the most equipped tools for the laboratory, creating a sport salon for enhancing mental and physical activity in students and giving scholarship to the most creative project and you name it. One should notice, the teaching is just a part of education story and other parts depend on the students' own efforts.
Moreover, there is a bit of different point here. This reward or salary may motivate some teachers to work hard; however, I believe that in such a circumstance, teachers prefer to spend their time on clever students instead of ordinary students; subsequently, this condition can create a biased atmosphere in the class.
As I have illustrated, I strongly disagree with this suggestion because our education system requires a big attention in other dimensions such as providing the best conditions and educational tools for students instead of enhancing teachers' income.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-04-02 | AMARDEEP KOUR GEDHU | 60 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 128, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ince they are prosperous humans; hence, this strata is deserved of respect; however,...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1022, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...t be a rational reason for boosting the teachers performance. The second reason why I...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, look, may, moreover, nevertheless, second, so, then, for instance, i feel, such as, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.0752688172 235% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2299.0 1977.66487455 116% => OK
No of words: 446.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15470852018 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5955099915 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89934589864 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 258.0 212.727598566 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578475336323 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 711.0 618.680645161 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.1344086022 154% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 91.2782245977 48.9658058833 186% => OK
Chars per sentence: 164.214285714 100.406767564 164% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.8571428571 20.6045352989 155% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0714285714 5.45110844103 203% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139675177929 0.236089414692 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0482799282473 0.076458572812 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0574998056018 0.0737576698707 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0833960888048 0.150856017488 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0465370677144 0.0645574589148 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.8 11.7677419355 160% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.01 58.1214874552 69% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.1575268817 152% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.01818996416 118% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 86.8835125448 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 10.002688172 175% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.0537634409 143% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.