Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Many things can improve our happiness while one of them would be our friends' role in our lives. Many people believe that the capability to sustain friendships with a few people for a long time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends quickly. However, I subscribe to the opposite view, and I substantiate my belief by providing some supportive reasons that are elucidated below.
It is worth bearing in mind that from a psychological viewpoint, communicating with different people can improve our happiness significantly. In fact, most people are gregarious, and they need to communicate with several people at different locations; otherwise, they might easily get depressed. It has been proven that people should have the ability to make new friends to strengthen their happiness since our close friends are not always near us. By way of illustration, consider a student who has some close friends at school. This student will work out of school soon or later; as a result, he/she might not meet his/her close friends frequently. In this situation, if he/she cannot make new friends, he/she might get depressed quickly.
Furthermore, people by communicating with different people and by making new friends can learn many things from them, and learning new abilities can significantly improve people's happiness. For example, I have some close friends, but none of them knows how to draw a portrait, and I am really interested in this skill. On the other hand, there are lots of people around me who know how to draw a portrait using different techniques. Since I would like to learn this skill, it would be necessary for me to communicate and become friends with them. Hence, it would be favorable for people to make some new friends and learn different things from them, which can considerably improve their happiness.
The sum and substance of this essay is that we should have the ability to make some new friends because communicating with different people can improve our happiness. Besides, by making new friends, we can learn various things from them which would strengthen our happiness rapidly.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-03 | sonyeoso | 80 | view |
| 2023-04-10 | KimiaKermanshahian | 76 | view |
| 2023-03-15 | MichelleGAOOO | 70 | view |
| 2022-12-14 | HSNDEK | 73 | view |
| 2022-11-24 | AT2G38040 | 70 | view |
- It is better for children to grow up in the countryside than in a big city. Do you agree or disagree? 76
- Businesses should hire employees for their entire lives. Do you agree or disagree? Use specific examples and reasons to support your answer 80
- Universities should give the same amount of money to their students’ sports activities as they give to their university libraries. 76
- It is better for children to grow up in the countryside than in a big city. Do you agree or disagree? 76
- it has been said that : not everything that is learned is contained in book . compare and contrast knowledge gained from experience with knowledge gained from book. In your opinion, which source is more important? why? 71
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, furthermore, hence, however, if, really, so, then, while, for example, in fact, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 9.8082437276 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1802.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 353.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10481586402 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78160427529 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 212.727598566 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.467422096317 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 538.2 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.5775142057 48.9658058833 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.625 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0625 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 5.45110844103 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279382704241 0.236089414692 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107386954287 0.076458572812 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113134381212 0.0737576698707 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203967800692 0.150856017488 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0725684250173 0.0645574589148 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.37 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 86.8835125448 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.