Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In today’s world, people significantly pay attention to history and what we can learn from experiences of precedents. A controversial question that is often raised regarding this issue is whether history courses should be necessary for all university students. Some people possess the conviction that history plays a prominent role in recent and future of human beings and all people have to be to some extent expert at it, whereas other hold the opposite view and allege that students ought to learn specific courses that are relative to their majors. I personally contend that although the importance of history is undeniable, school students should have history courses and in the university people should merely learn courses related to their expertise. To substantiate my point of view, the following paragraphs represent a cursary glance at the most outstanding reasons.
The first reason coming to mind to elucidate my standpoint is concerned with this issue that the time of university students is limited and they cannot learn different subjects from various fields. In other words, undergraduate and graduate students have to spend their time to gain knowledge about their expertise. Provided that students have redundtant time, they sould get internship in companies or conduct research. I believe that history is of vital importance, however, in my opinion students should leran it at schools instead of universities. University is a place for students to become a professional in one field. In order to make more clear, consider my personal experience. When I was an undergraduate student in civil engineering, university decided to present a mandatory course about history and geography. Students were absolutely unpleasant and they objected to this decision. Therefore, university was obliged to remove this course from the curriculm.
The second rationale behind this issue is rooted in the fact that nowadays, by the advancement of technology, individuals have access to data. if someone wants to get information about a specific subject, he or she can find it only by searching the internet. In another word, in previous decades teachers were the only source of knowledge, thus, if anyone wants to have information, he should partcipate in the teacher’s class. In the modern era, this is not a case and people have several avenues to valuable information. The noteworthy statistics revealed by a recent research conducted in my country shows that, in the last decade of ninteenth century, approximately 70 percents of people took part in class to learn about a subject and others used libraries, on the contrary, in recent 10 years more than 90 percent tend to use the internet to get aware of various information.
In brief, contemplating all the aforementioned reasons one soon realizes that with respect to the importance of history, schools sould have present historical courses, however, in the university people should merely learn courses which are related to their expertise.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 28, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'mind elucidating'.
Suggestion: mind elucidating
...ng reasons. The first reason coming to mind to elucidate my standpoint is concerned with this is...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 144, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...ology, individuals have access to data. if someone wants to get information about ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, regarding, second, so, therefore, thus, whereas, in brief, in my opinion, in other words, on the contrary, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 77.0 52.1666666667 148% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2535.0 1977.66487455 128% => OK
No of words: 476.0 407.700716846 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3256302521 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67091256922 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9511438251 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 251.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52731092437 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 798.3 618.680645161 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 14.0 4.94265232975 283% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 76.9300168985 48.9658058833 157% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.75 100.406767564 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8 20.6045352989 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.1 5.45110844103 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228297036509 0.236089414692 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0691776362799 0.076458572812 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0564541934686 0.0737576698707 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141633029931 0.150856017488 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0705917726374 0.0645574589148 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 11.7677419355 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 58.1214874552 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 10.9000537634 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 86.8835125448 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.