题目原文：
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
The history has an influential and tremendous impact on our lives. In fact, it is vitally important to learn about it and keep follow it because it is the guiding light that can guide our nation toward progress. Moreover, by taking the lesson from the past and apply it in the present, in this way we can achieve many successes and fulfill our goals because the past is the best teacher that provides us with the beneficial information that reflects positively on our future. Therefore, I personally believe that this type of topics should be taught and accompany other study fields due to its benefits in both terms of improving the educational level and enhance the social skills. The following explanations go as follows.
First, it is critical to creating a strong bond of relationship for our large social network in order to instill the concrete knowledge base which is deemed as the imperative factor in ones endeavor to success. Indeed, people can achieve that by knowing the background and history of diverse areas to be able to communicate and interact easily with different people and this has a favorable consequence on their personalities and helps them to thrive easily within the community. For instance, individuals that are used to enrich their mind by learning at least the basic history of different countries, they will be able to create the absolutely necessary and productive communication with their inhabitants. In addition, they will learn how to cooperate efficiently and collaborate effectively. Thus, such a collaborative environment will enhance their interpersonal skills immensely which have an imperative impact on their future workflow and productivity. In contrast, those who are slackers to know and learn about the past, they will be vulnerable to face myriad of obstacles and they will suffer a lot because they lack such skills and this will reflect negatively on their future work outcome. In conclusion, studying history is crucial due to its vital role in instilling the solid basis of the communication skills.
Second, universities must eagerly seek to advocate their students to broaden their horizon by teaching them about their identity and improve their sense of belonging to a certain group of people. In fact, this will aid them to refine their interdisciplinary development. For example, exposure to a structured learning environment will reinforce the information obtained in another realm such as at home or out in nature by being as a mean of retention. So, studying history will lead to refining the intellectual abilities by learning a myriad amount of new information. On the other hand, those who are indolent to ask for more information about their past, they will have a limited amount of knowledge because, without a history, they will be just like a tree without a root in a stormy weather. Consequently, to improve the educational level, students should be advocated to carve out knowledge about their history and other communities' history.
To sum up, the past has an indelible role on people' s lives by enhancing their large social network and their perspective. Hopefully, the universities assist their students in their endeavor as soon as possible.
- Car manufacturers and governments have been eagerly seeking a replacement for the automobile's main source of power, the internal-combustion engine. By far the most promising alternative source of energy for cars is the hydrogen-based fuel-cell engine, wh 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is important to know about events happening around the world, even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life. 75
- using books or electronic resources 73
- Carved stone balls are a curious type of artifact found at a number of locations in Scotland. They date from the late Neolithic period, around 4,000 years ago. They are round in shape; they were carved from several types of stone; most are about 70 mm in 76
- Some young adults want independence from their parents as soon as possible.Other young adults prefer to live with their families for a longer time. Whichof these situations do you think is better? Use specific reasons and examplesto support your opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 27, Rule ID: IT_IS_JJ_TO_VBG[1]
Message: Did you mean 'create'?
Suggestion: create
...s follows. First, it is critical to creating a strong bond of relationship for our l...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 638, Rule ID: ABSOLUTELY_ESSENTIAL[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessary'.
Suggestion: necessary
...ntries, they will be able to create the absolutely necessary and productive communication with their...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 982, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...ow and productivity. In contrast, those who are slackers to know and learn about the pa...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 930, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'communities'' or 'community's'?
Suggestion: communities'; community's
...knowledge about their history and other communities history. To sum up, the past has an...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, if, moreover, second, so, still, therefore, thus, as to, at least, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, in fact, such as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 56.0 43.0788530466 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 89.0 52.1666666667 171% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2701.0 1977.66487455 137% => OK
No of words: 524.0 407.700716846 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15458015267 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.7844588288 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94086570125 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 264.0 212.727598566 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.503816793893 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 855.0 618.680645161 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.197674811 48.9658058833 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.05 100.406767564 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2 20.6045352989 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1 5.45110844103 185% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159623284423 0.236089414692 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0547298795483 0.076458572812 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0390552022251 0.0737576698707 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104705050626 0.150856017488 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0126154487432 0.0645574589148 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 11.7677419355 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 58.1214874552 78% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 136.0 86.8835125448 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.