Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Although science and technology will continue to improve, the most significant improvements for the quality of people’s lives have already taken place.
Although people now live in a time that science and technology are going to continue to develop. From my perspective, I do not think the most significant improvements for the quality of people’s lives have already happened for several reasons as following.
First of all, though the medical technologies have improved, the possibilities of people getting diseases have not decreased yet. There still are lots of diseases such as cancer and AIDS which can make people die within a short time due to the limited medical technologies. Plenty of people die all over the world because of these kinds of diseases everyday, which is very hurtful. In addition, there are a number of congenital diseases which cannot be noticed before birth. These poor babies cannot get any therapy until they are born. Therefore, it will waste a lot of time for these little babies to get healed. Even worse, some babies will even die before birth during this long period. We cannot image how sad their parents will feel. Accordingly, people’s lives do not have the most extraordinary improvements till now even though science and technology improve continuously.
Second, car as the production of the industrialization provides lots of carbon dioxide which pollutes the environment. Thus, the quality of people’s lives still has room to be improved. Nowadays, there are more and more cars in people’s lives. They pour carbon dioxide into the atmosphere so people have to wear special masks to protect themselves from getting sick. Recently, the air pollution is getting worse. In this case, increasing number of people get lung cancer and some of them even die. Life is the first priority because people can do nothing without life. Car is very convenient for people in daily life. However, the condition of people’s lives do not get improved but become much worse. As a result, the most considerable improvements for the quality of people’s lives have not taken place.
Therefore, as the factors mentioned above, it is easy to draw the conclusion that it will take a long time for people to get the most significant developments for the quality of their lives. As the science and technology improved, I believe people can live better than ever someday.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave. 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement:The government should support scientific research that does not have any practical use. 73
- Suppose the following two jobs would pay you the same. Which one do you prefer： a job with challenging and interesting projects but less vacation days a job that is not so challenging and interesting but more vacation days. 76
- One can learn a lot about a person from the type of friends this person has. 70
- In order to succeed in doing a new job the ability to adapt oneself to the new environment is more important than the excellent knowledge of this job 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 350, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...orld because of these kinds of diseases everyday, which is very hurtful. In addition, th...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and technology improve continuously. Second, car as the production of the ind...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, first, however, if, second, so, still, therefore, thus, in addition, such as, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 43.0788530466 46% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1920.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 371.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17520215633 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38877662729 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87251117737 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 212.727598566 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.498652291105 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 600.3 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.6443912029 48.9658058833 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.4782608696 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1304347826 20.6045352989 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.26086956522 5.45110844103 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.366542486281 0.236089414692 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112412041479 0.076458572812 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117961766561 0.0737576698707 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.272252375468 0.150856017488 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102771767474 0.0645574589148 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.32 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 86.8835125448 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.