Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Although technology has made communication easier, there are still as many misunderstandings among people as there were in the past. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
With the assistance of technology, interacting through the internet has benefited people a lot as it enabled people to connect with each other without leaving their place, thereby saving time, energy, and resources. In my opinion, however, at some point, there are still some misapprehensions among people. I think this way for 2 reasons. And I’m going to explain the motives behind my opinion in the following essay.
First of all, despite making communication simpler, sometimes, communicating through technological devices can make it hard for people to clearly understand each other. In fact, not exactly knowing the person’s emotions you are in touch with can cause a mistaken understanding of any matter in question. For example, when texting to someone, that person do not see you face expressions, and this can cause them to not understand you correctly. Furthermore, using sarcasm while messaging is another potential misunderstanding source which can create unnecessary conflicts between people. As a matter of fact, without the exact explanation, using sarcasm can make the person on the other side of the phone frustrated.
Second of all, regardless of how many innovations have made in technology, sometimes, preventing misapprehensions cannot be managed by easier, faster, and profitable communication. Indeed, for most of the time, people themselves create conflicts and do not choose to solve them by using approachable technology. For instance, not concurring with her friend and having a mistaken understanding about a certain matter, a girl chooses not to communicate because of her attitude and egoistic character, thereby experiencing misunderstanding with her friend. Therefore, despite having an advanced communication available for anytime, the girl does not use it and create misunderstanding due to her ego.
In conclusion, thanks to the advances in technology, people, nowadays, reach out each other much more easily than in the past. However, at some point, all these innovations do not be enough for solving misunderstandings among people completely. Due to the facts of not knowing the very emotions of the person we are in touch with and personal characteristics of us.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, second, so, still, therefore, while, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, in fact, as a matter of fact, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 43.0788530466 56% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1885.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 341.0 407.700716846 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52785923754 4.8611393121 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2960624474 2.67179642975 123% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.568914956012 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 581.4 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3527080421 48.9658058833 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.8125 100.406767564 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3125 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.875 5.45110844103 200% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194362609553 0.236089414692 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0589043508782 0.076458572812 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0281944668254 0.0737576698707 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111516195187 0.150856017488 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0150730211944 0.0645574589148 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 11.7677419355 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 58.1214874552 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 10.9000537634 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 86.8835125448 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.