Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Although technology has made communication easier, there are still as many misunderstandings among people as there were in the past. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
It's true that technology has advanced a lot and it facilitates in many ways, similarly, it helps in better communication. However, solving the misunderstanding among people needs different approaches, deep emotions, and desires, if these were not there, no advanced technology can solve these old issues. I hold this opinion for several reasons, which I will explain in the below paragraphs.
To begin with, I believe honesty is the key to every relation. In some cases, misunderstanding develops which can be solved by conversation and spending a quality times. However, when these aren't solved by good communication there are other things need to be checked like how much two people are involved, efforts from both side, needs, love and care. So, if the people are lagging in these things no matter how advance technology is, how cheap communication facility is, the misunderstanding remain unsolved. For example, when I was young in college, me and my friend decided to do internship from different states and that was a turning point in our friendship. Before that decision we lived almost like together since birth. So, when we shifted to different place, we made different friends but we used to talk on daily bases, but when the life modifies further, we weren't able to spend much time with each other. We get distant without mentioning anything, and that was quiet natural. Afterwards, we tried to fix everything by making a normal call, video call but later we realised our inner desire are dead, so these call would make no sense. So, then I realised when someone want to keep the relation, they can maintain that no mattern what happen, but when the relation was not serious it won't last irrespective of how much facilities are available.
Further, I think some amount of conflicts can be solved by a proper communication. However, these are formal communication, which need to be solved at sometime, whereas strong relation need a proper time and strong understanding. There are numerous advantage of technology, so do disadvantages . Some people might use to solve problem and to protect relation while some uses technology to exploit relation. People now a days take advantage of advance facilities like to hide content, keep secrets from partner, which was not in past. For example, people can easily maintain two relation at a time, they can hide all the photographs, can talk two person at time on chat, so these things are infact ruining the relation. After doing all these things no matter how advance technology is no person would try to maintain relation and solve the misunderstanding. So, the key factor for relation is the all the ethics and moral of person, yes technology helps a bit but it can't change the intention of person.
To put it in nutshell, technology can help a lot in solving many problems but they main ingridient needed in relation is the understanding, trust, loyalty and most important ethics. If someone carry all the above character, technology is key to solve problem but if someone is deprive of all these things, they can't maintain a good relation, no matter how much facilities they get.
- easter island population decline cause 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Traditional ways of celebrating holidays are much less important today than they were in the past Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement For students the abil ity to listen well is just as important as the ability to read well Use specific reasons and example 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Dancing plays an important role in a culture Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- urban foresting 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 191, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
...ng a quality times. However, when these arent solved by good communication there are ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 870, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: weren't
... but when the life modifies further, we werent able to spend much time with each other...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1182, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'wants'.
Suggestion: wants
...sense. So, then I realised when someone want to keep the relation, they can maintain...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1327, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...erious it wont last irrespective of how much facilities are available. Further, I...
^^^^
Line 5, column 294, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ntage of technology, so do disadvantages . Some people might use to solve problem ...
^^
Line 5, column 371, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'uses'' or 'use's'?
Suggestion: uses'; use's
...blem and to protect relation while some uses technology to exploit relation. People ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 415, Rule ID: NOW_A_DAYS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nowadays'?
Suggestion: nowadays
... technology to exploit relation. People now a days take advantage of advance facilities li...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 419, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a day' or simply 'days'?
Suggestion: a day; days
...hnology to exploit relation. People now a days take advantage of advance facilities li...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 526, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the past'?
Suggestion: in the past
...eep secrets from partner, which was not in past. For example, people can easily maintai...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 647, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'person' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'people', 'persons'.
Suggestion: people; persons
... hide all the photographs, can talk two person at time on chat, so these things are in...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 967, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...rson, yes technology helps a bit but it cant change the intention of person. To ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 967, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'cants'?
Suggestion: cants
...rson, yes technology helps a bit but it cant change the intention of person. To ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 194, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'carries'.
Suggestion: carries
...y and most important ethics. If someone carry all the above character, technology is ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 278, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'deprived'.
Suggestion: deprived
... key to solve problem but if someone is deprive of all these things, they cant maintain...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 312, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ne is deprive of all these things, they cant maintain a good relation, no matter how...
^^^^
Line 7, column 357, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...maintain a good relation, no matter how much facilities they get.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, similarly, so, then, whereas, while, for example, i think, in some cases, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 15.1003584229 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.0752688172 272% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2619.0 1977.66487455 132% => OK
No of words: 526.0 407.700716846 129% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97908745247 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.78901763229 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85929103551 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 260.0 212.727598566 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.494296577947 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 820.8 618.680645161 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.2029712872 48.9658058833 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.869565217 100.406767564 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8695652174 20.6045352989 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5652173913 5.45110844103 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 16.0 5.5376344086 289% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.10481757656 0.236089414692 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.03418358831 0.076458572812 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0324856057234 0.0737576698707 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0714497726178 0.150856017488 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0236176485806 0.0645574589148 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 86.8835125448 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.