Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In our contemporary world, with dramatic changes in social values, the traditional virtue of telling the truth under any circumstances in various kinds of relationships is increasingly doubted among the public. While many people believe honesty plays a vital role in maintaining healthy relationships, others think that telling the truth is not always the best policy to preserve the bond. I firmly hold the view that the positive effects of telling the truth are undeniable and worthy of support. In what follows, I will aptly substantiate my viewpoints.
A central argument for always telling the truth is the fact that honesty will create trustiness and lead to a long-lasting friendship. In our isolated society, which loneliness is a striking issue, everyone is striving for an honest, loyal, and trustworthy friend, who can be reliable and stand by her side in sadness and happiness along the life journey. Studies show that there is a significant and positive connection between telling the truth and a sense of confidence and trust between parties of friendship. To put in other words, without truthfulness, friendship content is undeniably meaningless and can’t last over a length of time. The best example to highlight the importance of being honest is my deep-rooted friendship with my intimate friend, with whom I have made friends since we were high school students. In all these years, with falls and rises, honesty has been the backbone of our relationship.
On the other hand, lying and even concealing a trivial truth can ruin the multi-year reputation in the less than a blink of an eye. In the competitive business world, which any tiniest mistake can jeopardize the position of the company in the market, adherence to the truth should be the first and foremost principle of every single contract, otherwise, the culprit company will face serious consequences. I remember when I was an intern at an insurance company, there was a client whose factory was destroyed in a fire accident. According to the contract, our company had to pay a great deal of money for all the damages. But to pay less our manager tried to manipulate the contract and broke the law. Afterward, the lawyer of the factory owner realized the scandal and accused our firm of the crime. Finally, our company not only got severe punishments for misdeeds but also did lose its validity among the insurance industry.
To wrap up, although there are some beliefs in support of not telling the whole truth, honesty is always appreciated under any conditions, due to maintain the long-run relationship and preserve its credibility.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-05 | YasamanEsml | 70 | view |
| 2023-06-05 | YasamanEsml | 70 | view |
| 2023-04-10 | sonyeoso | 78 | view |
| 2023-01-18 | theprasad | 70 | view |
| 2022-11-22 | joyce05 | 60 | view |
- Integrated TPO 1 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 95
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement At universities and colleges sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support Use specific reasons and examples to support your ans 92
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, so, while, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 43.0788530466 56% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2195.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 431.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09280742459 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55637350225 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86436663653 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 247.0 212.727598566 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573085846868 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 666.9 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 13.0 4.94265232975 263% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.6252895678 48.9658058833 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.944444444 100.406767564 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9444444444 20.6045352989 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.16666666667 5.45110844103 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171737451533 0.236089414692 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.049966889433 0.076458572812 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0522638590516 0.0737576698707 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118349544151 0.150856017488 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0571312935955 0.0645574589148 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 11.7677419355 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 10.9000537634 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 86.8835125448 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.