Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past.
Throughout the history, in all civilized societies, the issue of people's happiness engendered copious controversies amog other people. Some people are inclined toward the opinion that people now are less happy since the world is changing so swifly. Some others, however, may take an opposite viewpoint and believe that people are more satisfied with their lives. As far as I am concerned, because the world is altering so quickly, people are more happy than people were in the past. In the following paragraphs, I will pinpoint the most outstanding reasons.
The first exquisite point is that the development in the technology made the life more convinient. Nowadays, it is true that advancement in the technology happen at a very fast pace and causes many things to change. But, this alteration help people to have easier life. For example, a person who move abroad to continue his education in another country, can talk to his parents all the time by using skype and telegram. In contrast, in the past a student who leave his country should write a letter for his parents and it takes a lof time for his family to recieve his letter and respond to their son. Therefore, the enhancement of the life is vital and necessary for people and enrich their lifestyle.
The second significant reason supporting my idea is that researchers invent many crucial facilities. Juvenils who were interested in listening to music or watching movie should go to the store and buy a tape or cd. Also, they could use the interenet dial up which has a very slow speed for download and waste their time. In the contrast, companies now use a cable for internet connection that has a high speed for download. Thus, young people enjoy using this internet connection because they can easily download whatever they want and they are not oblige to go to store for getting a movie. Therefore, it helps them to save their time. Additionally, they are many material and inforamtion on the internet that students can us them. Conversely, in the past it was an arduous task for students to search for inforamtion.
To make a long story short, based on the aforementioned arguments, people have happier life today since the life is more convinient and there are more equipment. Consequently, it is highly recommended that all people take advantage of the situation. In fact, there are myriad of other reasons, challenging the above statement, which could be mentioned but are not embrace due to the dearth of time.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-07-30 | Baidaakamil1 | 62 | view |
- It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?If people have the opportunity to get a secure job, they should take it right away rather than wait for a job that would be more satisfying. 60
- TPO29 73
- TPO8 3
- TPO 11 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 549, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'obliged'.
Suggestion: obliged
...oad whatever they want and they are not oblige to go to store for getting a movie. The...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, conversely, first, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, thus, for example, in contrast, in fact, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2064.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 422.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89099526066 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53239876712 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70491584133 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547393364929 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 657.0 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.8273447997 48.9658058833 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.8181818182 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1818181818 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.18181818182 5.45110844103 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245211918792 0.236089414692 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0681554083473 0.076458572812 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0971749901818 0.0737576698707 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156412559797 0.150856017488 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.164436372688 0.0645574589148 255% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 11.7677419355 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 86.8835125448 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.